Descriptor
| Access to Education | 1 |
| Blacks | 1 |
| Civil Rights | 1 |
| Court Litigation | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Equal Education | 1 |
| Federal Courts | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Racial Discrimination | 1 |
| Racial Relations | 1 |
| Racial Segregation | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Negro Educational Review | 1 |
Author
| Reike, Richard D. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Opinion Papers | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Bakke v Regents of University… | 1 |
| Brown v Board of Education | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedReike, Richard D. – Negro Educational Review, 1985
The nature of legal argument, including judicial decisions, puts severe limits on the educational advances that can be expected by Black Americans through litigation. The Brown decision, for example, has been a mixed blessing, and the Bakke case shows that the Court is unwilling to support a class-based remedy for discrimination. (KH)
Descriptors: Access to Education, Blacks, Civil Rights, Court Litigation
