Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Design | 1 |
| Educational Innovation | 1 |
| Engineering | 1 |
| Engineering Education | 1 |
| Expertise | 1 |
| Faculty Development | 1 |
| Likert Scales | 1 |
| Mathematics Teachers | 1 |
| Measures (Individuals) | 1 |
| Online Surveys | 1 |
| Pretests Posttests | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Journal of Pre-College… | 1 |
Author
| Ko, Pat | 1 |
| Martin, Taylor | 1 |
| Peacock, Stephanie Baker | 1 |
| Rudolph, Jennifer J. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
| Tests/Questionnaires | 1 |
Education Level
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| Texas | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkMartin, Taylor; Peacock, Stephanie Baker; Ko, Pat; Rudolph, Jennifer J. – Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 2015
Although the consensus seems to be that high-school-level introductory engineering courses should focus on design, this creates a problem for teacher training. Traditionally, math and science teachers are trained to teach and assess factual knowledge and closed-ended problem-solving techniques specific to a particular discipline, which is unsuited…
Descriptors: Teacher Education, Faculty Development, Engineering, Engineering Education
