This quasiexperiment tests the effect of the use of a randomized name generator (wheel of discussion) on course performance in an introductory psychology course. In one section of the course, the instructor implemented the use of the wheel of discussion immediately, whereas, in the second section, the instructor introduced the wheel of discussion after the second exam. Results revealed a marginal difference in course performance between the two sections, such that students performed better when the wheel was present. All students reported a perceived increase in engagement resulting from the use of the wheel. Results suggest that the use of a randomized name generator may be one way to improve engagement.