Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 1 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Models | 2 |
| Program Evaluation | 2 |
| Research Methodology | 2 |
| Academically Gifted | 1 |
| Barriers | 1 |
| Cooperation | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 1 |
| Evaluation Methods | 1 |
| Gifted | 1 |
| Special Education | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Carter, Kyle R. | 1 |
| Makel, Matthew C. | 1 |
| McBee, Matthew T. | 1 |
| Miller, Erin M. | 1 |
| Peters, Scott J. | 1 |
| Smith, Kendal N. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 2 |
| Guides - Non-Classroom | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 1 |
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkMakel, Matthew C.; Smith, Kendal N.; Miller, Erin M.; Peters, Scott J.; McBee, Matthew T. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2020
Existing research practices in gifted education have many areas for potential improvement so that they can provide useful, generalizable evidence to various stakeholders. In this article, we first review the field's current research practices and consider the quality and utility of its research findings. Next, we discuss how open science practices…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Talent Development, Educational Research, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedCarter, Kyle R. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1992
The article presents and illustrates use of an evaluation model for assessing programs for the gifted where tight experimental control is not possible. The model consists of four components: ex post factor designs including intact groups; comparative evaluation; strength of treatment; and multiple outcome assessment from flexible data sources. (DB)
Descriptors: Elementary Secondary Education, Evaluation Methods, Gifted, Models
