NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015
Psychologists show great curiosity about the world and human behavior. They are forever asking Why? Or What? Or How? about various aspects of human behavior. It is no surprise, therefore, that they respond enthusiastically to some of the questions surrounding the behavior of those labeled as gifted and talented in our society. As will be seen in…
Descriptors: Psychology, Psychologists, Gifted, Student Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015
The classroom, with its complex social structure and kaleidoscope of cognitive and phycho-sociological variables, has not often been the object of serious research. Content area specialists have concentrated on the sequential organization of materials and have left the direct applications of these materials, either to the intuitive strategies of…
Descriptors: Biology, Science Instruction, Academically Gifted, Teacher Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015
In this article, James J. Gallagher proposes that understanding the political issues and the debate surrounding the education of gifted students is based on the recognition that education policy (including rules, regulations, financial allocations, etc.) reflects social policy. Hence, society prioritizes needs so that the most important of these…
Descriptors: Gifted, Politics of Education, Educational Policy, Educational Resources
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015
The variables associated with peer acceptance and rejection have been the subject of considerable investigation over the past few years, therefore, the present study was designed to answer three questions: (1) How socially accepted are highly gifted children in the elementary-school classroom? (2) What is the intellectual level of the children…
Descriptors: Peer Acceptance, Academically Gifted, Elementary School Students, Rejection (Psychology)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2015
In this article, James J. Gallagher explains, in the context of education, that "civil rights" means the guarantee of equal opportunity and justice for all and the actions taken against those barriers that stand in the way of such equality. How does the issue of civil rights bear on an area of special education such as the education of…
Descriptors: Academically Gifted, Civil Rights, Educational Opportunities, Student Motivation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 2011
In a previous issue of this journal, four present and former editors of the most prestigious journals provide their judgment on the current field of gifted education (Ambrose, VanTassel-Baska, Coleman, & Cross, 2010). They believe that the field is insular, fractured, porous, and contested, and they provide many examples to illustrate their…
Descriptors: Gifted, Editing, Periodicals, Educational Attitudes
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
George, Pamela G.; Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1978
In the study, 110 fifth and sixth grade children of both gifted and average ability levels confirmed that they are capable of reflecting on future occurrences, of assessing the probability of positive or negative outcomes, and of identifying implications of those future occurrences. (Author/SBH)
Descriptors: Elementary Education, Exceptional Child Research, Futures (of Society), Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1990
This editorial reviews the literature on the emotional states of gifted children, pointing out design flaws and the problem of using averages in such studies. Specific topics discussed include supersensitivity, guilt feelings in those who are gifted, the gifted underachiever, stress and coping, and fields for future research. (PB)
Descriptors: Coping, Elementary Secondary Education, Emotional Adjustment, Emotional Problems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Coleman, Mary Ruth; Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1995
Features of programs that successfully blended the middle school (MS) model or cooperative learning (CL) model with gifted education were assessed. Site visits were made to five MS sites and five CL sites at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. Studies showed that gifted students' needs can be met within these programs, with appropriate…
Descriptors: Case Studies, Cooperative Learning, Delivery Systems, Educational Change
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1991
Implications of the term "gifted," including that of unjustified and unearned privilege, are considered in the context of findings on intelligence development, self-efficacy, education, prevalence, and the importance of labels. Five policy options are considered including abandoning the term and using performance rather than aptitude to organize…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Definitions, Educational Philosophy, Eligibility
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1991
This paper on underachievement in gifted students distinguishes between environmental, personal-neurological, and personal-psychological causes of underachievement. Characteristics of gifted underachievers are described, and strategies to change the pattern of the "personal-psychological" underachiever are discussed, with emphasis on coping…
Descriptors: Coping, Elementary Secondary Education, Etiology, Gifted
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gallagher, James J. – Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 1996
Analysis of current critiques of gifted education considers four common concerns: (1) whether giftedness exists; (2) whether students who possess giftedness can be identified; (3) whether such students can be provided with quality differentiated programs and services; and (4) whether it is morally correct to provide such programs or services. (DB)
Descriptors: Ability Identification, Access to Education, Educational Objectives, Educational Philosophy