Descriptor
| Revision (Written Composition) | 3 |
| Teaching Methods | 3 |
| Writing Instruction | 3 |
| Student Attitudes | 2 |
| Classroom Techniques | 1 |
| Collaborative Writing | 1 |
| Editors | 1 |
| English Curriculum | 1 |
| English Instruction | 1 |
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Junior High Schools | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| English in Texas | 3 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 3 |
| Guides - Classroom - Teacher | 1 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewedHinnefeld, Joyce – English in Texas, 1994
Describes the relationship between editors and writers. Shows how this relationship is manifested in the way writing is revised and subsequently published. (HB)
Descriptors: Classroom Techniques, Collaborative Writing, Editors, English Curriculum
Peer reviewedStetson, Maura – English in Texas, 1994
Argues that, difficult though it is to learn, revision is one of the most important components in helping students to perceive themselves as writers. Offers several teaching strategies for fostering revision. (SR)
Descriptors: Junior High Schools, Middle Schools, Revision (Written Composition), Student Attitudes
Peer reviewedJohnson, Jan – English in Texas, 1995
Explains how a teacher uses the acronym SOAR (Sentences Organized and Revised) as the core of a game designed to motivate a class to revise their work through the promise of popcorn, free time, or snacks for their revision work. Describes a worksheet that forces students to pay attention to various parts of their paper. (TB)
Descriptors: Lesson Plans, Revision (Written Composition), Secondary Education, Student Attitudes
