NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Source
Educational and Psychological…4
Author
Vegelius, Jan4
Janson, Svante,1
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 4 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vegelius, Jan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1981
The G index is a measure of the similarity between individuals over dichotomous items. Some tests for the G-index are described. For each case an example is included. (Author/GK)
Descriptors: Hypothesis Testing, Mathematical Formulas, Mathematical Models, Nonparametric Statistics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vegelius, Jan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
One argument against the G index is that, unlike phi, it is not a correlation coefficient; yet, G conforms to the Kendall and E-coefficient definitions. The G index is also equal to the Pearson product moment correlation coefficient obtained from double scoring. (Author/CP)
Descriptors: Correlation, Mathematical Formulas, Test Reliability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vegelius, Jan; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
The Weighted H Index Delegate Discriminant Analysis method (WHIDD-analysis) is presented. It is rather similar to Holley's G-analysis, but does not utilize any component analysis and is thus cheaper and simpler to use. The WHIDD-analysis uses the weighted H-index as the E-correlation coefficient. (Author/BW)
Descriptors: Discriminant Analysis, Mathematical Formulas
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Janson, Svante,; Vegelius, Jan – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1980
The value of the phi coefficient cannot, in general, be uniquely determined from the G index. G is more suitable than the phi coefficient as a measure of similarity between individuals, because phi is too unstable over item reflection. (Author/RL)
Descriptors: Comparative Analysis, Mathematical Formulas, Measurement Techniques