NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 3 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tay, Louis; Huang, Qiming; Vermunt, Jeroen K. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2016
In large-scale testing, the use of multigroup approaches is limited for assessing differential item functioning (DIF) across multiple variables as DIF is examined for each variable separately. In contrast, the item response theory with covariate (IRT-C) procedure can be used to examine DIF across multiple variables (covariates) simultaneously. To…
Descriptors: Item Response Theory, Test Bias, Simulation, College Entrance Examinations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wolkowitz, Amanda A.; Skorupski, William P. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2013
When missing values are present in item response data, there are a number of ways one might impute a correct or incorrect response to a multiple-choice item. There are significantly fewer methods for imputing the actual response option an examinee may have provided if he or she had not omitted the item either purposely or accidentally. This…
Descriptors: Multiple Choice Tests, Statistical Analysis, Models, Accuracy
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Santelices, Maria Veronica; Wilson, Mark – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2012
The relationship between differential item functioning (DIF) and item difficulty on the SAT is such that more difficult items tended to exhibit DIF in favor of the focal group (usually minority groups). These results were reported by Kulick and Hu, and Freedle and have been enthusiastically discussed by more recent literature. Examining the…
Descriptors: Test Bias, Test Items, Difficulty Level, Statistical Analysis