Publication Date
In 2024 | 0 |
Since 2023 | 0 |
Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 0 |
Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 3 |
Descriptor
Source
Education Week | 3 |
Publication Type
Journal Articles | 3 |
Reports - Descriptive | 3 |
Education Level
Elementary Secondary Education | 2 |
Audience
Location
Michigan | 3 |
Georgia | 2 |
Alabama | 1 |
Arizona | 1 |
California | 1 |
Colorado | 1 |
District of Columbia | 1 |
Maryland | 1 |
Missouri | 1 |
Nevada | 1 |
New Jersey | 1 |
More ▼ |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 3 |
Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
McNeil, Michele – Education Week, 2012
Given the flexibility to revise their academic goals under the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act, a vast majority of the states that received federal waivers are setting different expectations for different subgroups of students, an "Education Week" analysis shows. That marks a dramatic shift in policy and philosophy from the original law.…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Academic Achievement, Goal Orientation, Expectation
Gewertz, Catherine – Education Week, 2009
A Washington research group is raising questions about the wisdom of the U.S. Department of Education's favored strategies for turning around the lowest-performing schools with stimulus funding, saying that its research shows that similar federal approaches to school restructuring have not been effective. The questions raised by the new study were…
Descriptors: School Restructuring, Elementary Secondary Education, Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement
Zehr, Mary Ann – Education Week, 2005
The U.S. Department of Education's first-ever evaluation of how states are meeting requirements for English-language learners under the federal No Child Left Behind Act can be looked at two ways. One view of the report, which was released to Congress on March 15, 2005, is that states have made great strides in laying the groundwork for schools to…
Descriptors: Federal Government, Educational Assessment, Educational Improvement, Politics of Education