NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 12 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Demby, Hilary; Jenner, Lynne; Gregory, Alethia; Jenner, Eric – American Journal of Evaluation, 2020
Despite the increase in federal tiered evidence initiatives that require the use of rigorous evaluation designs, such as randomized experiments, there has been limited guidance in the evaluation literature on practical strategies to implement such studies successfully. This paper provides lessons learned in executing experiments in applied…
Descriptors: Randomized Controlled Trials, Evaluation, Experiments, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Labin, Susan N. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
A fundamental reason for doing evaluation capacity building (ECB) is to improve program outcomes. Developing common measures of outcomes and the activities, processes, and factors that lead to these outcomes is an important step in moving the science and the practice of ECB forward. This article identifies a number of existing ECB measurement…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Capacity Building, Outcome Measures, Models
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Wandersman, Abraham – American Journal of Evaluation, 2014
The Labin et al. logic model describes the why, how, what, and potential outcomes of evaluation capacity building (ECB). Getting To Outcomes offers a frame and empirical results for operationalizing the ECB logic model of Labin et al. and for deepening the science and practice of ECB.
Descriptors: Evaluation, Capacity Building, Methods, Accountability
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kosheleva, Natalia; Segone, Marco – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In many less developed democracies Voluntary Organizations for Professional Evaluation (VOPEs) face the challenges of low demand for evaluation and the resulting low economic capacity of national evaluation communities. The VOPE model that evolved in well-developed democracies is not directly applicable under these circumstances, so a new model…
Descriptors: Voluntary Agencies, Evaluation, Developing Nations, Professional Associations
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cousins, J. Bradley; Whitmore, Elizabeth; Shulha, Lyn – American Journal of Evaluation, 2013
In this article, we critique two recent theoretical developments about collaborative inquiry in evaluation--using logic models as a means to understand theory, and efforts to compartmentalize versions of collaborative inquiry into discrete genres--as a basis for considering future direction for the field. We argue that collaborative inquiry in…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Models, Educational Principles, Inquiry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Nielsen, Steffen Bohni; Lemire, Sebastian; Skov, Majbritt – American Journal of Evaluation, 2011
Evaluation capacity building (ECB) has become an area in the evaluation field that is attracting both scholarly attention and the practical work of evaluators. Despite some recent contributions, differing conceptions still exist concerning what constitutes ECB, let alone the nature of the capacity being built. Responding to an earlier call on the…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Local Government, Models, Measurement
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hay, Katherine – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
This article examines evaluation field building in South Asia and the role of international collaboration in this field building. The article explores aspects of the supply and demand of development evaluation and the political, historical, and systemic factors that bridge or block evaluation use. The article calls for and suggests elements to…
Descriptors: Supply and Demand, Professional Associations, Foreign Countries, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hunt, Kim Steven; Sridharan, Sanjeev – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Evaluations of complex interventions such as sentencing guidelines provide an opportunity to understand the mechanisms by which policies and programs can impact intermediate and long-term outcomes. There is limited previous discussion of the underlying frameworks by which sentencing guidelines can impact outcomes such as crime rates. Guided by a…
Descriptors: Crime, Correctional Institutions, Theory Practice Relationship, Program Effectiveness
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smith, Nick L. – American Journal of Evaluation, 2010
Prior evaluations of evaluation theory have been problematic due in part to confusion about what exactly is being assessed. After drawing distinctions among evaluation theories, models, and approaches, the author examines three aspects of evaluation models and considers how the evaluation of a model depends on which aspect is being examined. The…
Descriptors: Evaluation, Theories, Models, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Skolits, Gary J.; Morrow, Jennifer Ann; Burr, Erin Mehalic – American Journal of Evaluation, 2009
The current evaluation literature tends to conceptualize evaluator roles as a single, overarching orientation toward an evaluation, an orientation largely driven by evaluation methods, models, or stakeholder orientations. Roles identified range from a social transformer or a neutral social scientist to that of an educator or even a power merchant.…
Descriptors: Evaluators, Evaluation Methods, Social Scientists, Stakeholders
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Smits, Pernelle A.; Champagne, Francois – American Journal of Evaluation, 2008
This article is concerned with the underpinnings of practical participatory evaluation (PPE). Evaluation approaches have long been criticized because their results are often not used. It is believed that PPE addresses this drawback. The article focuses on the mechanisms underlying the links between activities and consequences in PPE. A PPE theory…
Descriptors: Learning Theories, Evaluation Methods, Participation, Evaluators
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Renger, Ralph; Titcomb, Allison – American Journal of Evaluation, 2002
Describes a three-step approach to teaching logic models that entails: (1) identification of antecedent conditions; (2) ensuring that program activities target antecedent conditions; and (3) a focus on measurement issues, depicting the indicators and objectives for outcomes included in the evaluation plan. (SLD)
Descriptors: Evaluation, Logic, Models, Program Effectiveness