NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Audience
Researchers4
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Health Insurance Portability…1
Assessments and Surveys
Positive and Negative Affect…1
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 252 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kelly Laas; Christine Z. Miller; Eric M. Brey; Elisabeth Hildt – Research Ethics, 2025
Student researchers encounter ethical issues daily, but little is known about their unique perspectives. This article presents the results of 30 qualitative semi-structured interviews exploring students' views and experiences around ethical issues in research groups. During the interviews, students were asked to describe challenges and successes…
Descriptors: Undergraduate Students, Graduate Students, Laboratory Procedures, Laboratory Training
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Roza Sagitova; Zarena Syrgak kyzy; Lynne Parmenter – Research Ethics, 2025
This paper addresses the issue of how local and global norms and requirements are negotiated in the early stages of development of Social Science research ethics policy in a Global South context. A review of relevant literature followed by analysis of relevant national and institutional policies highlights both tensions and creative potential for…
Descriptors: Developing Nations, Social Science Research, Local Norms, Global Approach
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Olivier Leclerc; Nicolas Klausser – Research Ethics, 2025
Reporting and investigating research misconduct can lead to disciplinary proceedings being initiated, and ultimately to disciplinary sanctions being imposed on convicted scientists. The conversion of research misconduct findings into disciplinary sanctions is poorly understood. This article analyses all the disciplinary decisions handed down on…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Graduate Students, Researchers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Cathrine Moe; Lisbeth Uhrenfeldt; Ingjerd Gåre Kymre – Research Ethics, 2025
The increasing need for innovative research driven by rapid global changes gives doctoral supervisors of early-stage researchers a significant role in facilitating the ethical conduct of qualitative research. In the context of European Commission funding, the demands of research ethics and integrity place a tremendous responsibility on the…
Descriptors: Doctoral Students, Student Research, Ethics, Supervision
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Alice Cavolo; Daniel Pizzolato – Research Ethics, 2025
Artificial placentas (APs) are technologies that mimic the human placenta to treat extremely preterm infants. Being an invasive and risky technology, it will raise important ethical questions for human trials. Hence, in this Topic Piece we provide a blueprint of further issues to investigate. First, counselling will have the double role of…
Descriptors: Human Body, Physiology, Pregnancy, Decision Making
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Xinqu Zhang; Peng Wang – Research Ethics, 2025
Unethical research practices are prevalent in China, but little research has focused on the causes of these practices. Drawing on the criminology literature on organisational deviance, as well as the concept of "cengceng jiama," which illustrates the increase of pressure in the process of policy implementation within a top-down…
Descriptors: Research Problems, Ethics, Productivity, Universities
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tejendra Pherali; Sara Bragg; Catherine Borra; Phil Jones – Research Ethics, 2025
The COVID-19 pandemic posed many ethical and practical challenges for academic research. Some of these have been documented, particularly in relation to health research, but less attention has been paid to the dilemmas encountered by educational and social science research. Given that pandemics are predicted to be more frequent, it is vital to…
Descriptors: COVID-19, Pandemics, Barriers, Ethics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Göran Lövestam; Susanne Bremer-Hoffmann; Koen Jonkers; Pieter van Nes – Research Ethics, 2025
The Joint Research Centre (JRC) is the European Commission's in-house science and knowledge service, employing a substantial staff of scientists devoted to conducting research to provide independent scientific advice for EU policy. Focussed on various research areas aligned with EU priorities, the JRC excels in delivering scientific evidence for…
Descriptors: Integrity, Ethics, Scientific Research, Scientists
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mohammad Hosseini; David B. Resnik – Research Ethics, 2025
Journals and publishers are increasingly using artificial intelligence (AI) to screen submissions for potential misconduct, including plagiarism and data or image manipulation. While using AI can enhance the integrity of published manuscripts, it can also increase the risk of false/unsubstantiated allegations. Ambiguities related to journals' and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Plagiarism, Writing for Publication, Periodicals
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Winnie Lay; Loretta Gasparini; William Siero; Elizabeth K. Hughes – Research Ethics, 2025
Dynamic consent is increasingly recommended for longitudinal and biobanking research; however, the value of investing in such systems is unclear. We undertook a rapid review of the benefits and challenges of implementing dynamic consent by searching five databases (Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and…
Descriptors: Databases, Research Reports, Researchers, Research Methodology
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kimberley Serpico – Research Ethics, 2024
The quality of a research study application sends a distinct signal to the institutional review board (IRB) about the skills, capacities, preparation, communication, experience, and resources of its authors. However, efforts to research and define IRB application quality have been insufficient. Inattention to the quality of an IRB application is…
Descriptors: Ethics, Research Methodology, Institutional Evaluation, Governing Boards
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Amanda B. Lees; Rosemary Godbold; Simon Walters – Research Ethics, 2024
While the need to protect vulnerable research participants is universal, conceptual challenges with the notion of vulnerability may result in the under or over-protection of participants. Ethics review bodies making assumptions about who is vulnerable and in what circumstance can be viewed as paternalistic if they do not consider participant…
Descriptors: Educational Research, Scholarship, Instruction, Learning
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Tiwonge K. Mtande; Carl Lombard; Gonasagrie Nair; Stuart Rennie – Research Ethics, 2024
Although the use of the cluster randomized trial (CRT) design to evaluate vaccines, public health interventions or health systems is increasing, the ethical issues posed by the design are not adequately addressed, especially in low- and middle-income country settings (LMICs). To help reveal ethical challenges, qualitative interviews were conducted…
Descriptors: Stakeholders, Ethics, Randomized Controlled Trials, Medical Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gwen Lemey; Trésor Zola; Ynke Larivière; Solange Milolo; Engbu Danoff; Lazarre Bakonga; Emmanuel Esanga; Peter Vermeiren; Vivi Maketa; Junior Matangila; Patrick Mitashi; Pierre Van Damme; Jean-Pierre Van geertruyden; Raffaella Ravinetto; Hypolite Muhindo-Mavoko – Research Ethics, 2024
In this paper, we discuss challenges associated with implementing a policy for Ancillary Care (AC) for related and unrelated (serious) adverse events during an Ebola vaccine trial conducted in a remote area of the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Conducting clinical trials in resource-constrained settings can raise context-related challenges that…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Immunization Programs, Communicable Diseases, Researchers
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Mathilde Léon; Shoba S. Meera; Anne-Caroline Fiévet; Alejandrina Cristia – Research Ethics, 2024
The last decade has seen a rise in big data approaches, including in the humanities, whereby large quantities of data are collected and analysed. In this paper, we discuss long-form audio recordings that result from individuals wearing a recording device for many hours. Linguists, psychologists and anthropologists can use them, for example, to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Developing Nations, Data Collection, Audio Equipment
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  17