NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20190
Since 20180
Since 2015 (last 5 years)0
Since 2010 (last 10 years)0
Since 2000 (last 20 years)6
Author
Shaman, Susan6
Shapiro, Daniel B.6
Zemsky, Robert6
Education Level
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing all 6 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zemsky, Robert; Shaman, Susan; Shapiro, Daniel B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
Using the revenue histories of seven institutions to highlight industry-wide trends, this article focuses on how the pursuit of revenue accelerated the shift from institutional to market perspectives across U.S. higher education. (EV)
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Change, Educational Trends, Free Enterprise System
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zemsky, Robert; Shaman, Susan; Shapiro, Daniel B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
Presents a market taxonomy for higher education, including what it reveals about the structure of the market, the model's technical attributes, and its capacity to explain pricing behavior. Details the identification of the principle seams separating one market segment from another and how student aspirations help to organize the market, making…
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Change, Educational Trends, Free Enterprise System
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zemsky, Robert; Shaman, Susan; Shapiro, Daniel B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
Explores various market segments in higher education, demonstrating how faculty salaries, faculty-student ratios, use of part-time faculty, and student choice follow the ordering of the market. Teaching practices, on the other hand, appear to be invariant across market segments. (EV)
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Change, Educational Trends, Free Enterprise System
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zemsky, Robert; Shaman, Susan; Shapiro, Daniel B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
Describes the Collegiate Results Instrument (CRI), which measures a range of collegiate outcomes for alumni 6 years after graduation. The CRI was designed to target alumni from institutions across market segments and assess their values, abilities, work skills, occupations, and pursuit of lifelong learning. (EV)
Descriptors: Alumni, College Graduates, College Outcomes Assessment, Competition
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zemsky, Robert; Shaman, Susan; Shapiro, Daniel B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
Discusses the uses to which the Collegiate Results Instrument (CRI), discussed in another article in this issue, can be put by institutions and prospective students. Explores: What does the CRI teach an institution about its signature in the marketplace? How different are those signatures? Do they differ within and across market segments? What…
Descriptors: Alumni, College Choice, College Graduates, College Outcomes Assessment
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Zemsky, Robert; Shaman, Susan; Shapiro, Daniel B. – New Directions for Institutional Research, 2001
Proposes a set of axioms, rules, and practical tools that campuses can use when they ask: What is our market position and is repositioning possible? The tools are designed to help higher education institutional leaders and researchers achieve the goal of being both market smart and mission centered. (EV)
Descriptors: Competition, Educational Change, Educational Trends, Free Enterprise System