NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing all 5 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Gillis, John Stuart; Lee, Daniel C. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The Sixteen Personality Factor Questionnaire, Gordon Personal Profile, and Gordon Personal Inventory were administered to 151 male and female high school students. Multiple regression analysis indicated that the personality scales of each test could be predicted from the scales of the other tests. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Correlation, Foreign Countries, High Schools, Multiple Regression Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pasewark, Richard A.; Sawyer, Robert N. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The Edwards Personal Preference Schedule was administered to three samples rural high school students. Distributions of scores were similar to Edwards' college sample, except in the area of sex differences. (JKS)
Descriptors: Age Differences, High School Students, High Schools, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Martin, John D.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The degree of relationship between scores on the Barron Ego Strength Scale and the scores on the Bender-Gestalt Test was investigated on a sample of college students. Correlations were moderate to low. Racial differences were observed on the Bender-Gestalt Test. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Correlation, Higher Education, Personality Measures, Racial Differences
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Douglass, Jacqueline A. – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The validity of two subjective approaches to judging in synchronized swimming were examined through a multitrait-multimethod matrix. Results indicated that judging panels tended not to differentiate between execution and content scores. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Behavior Rating Scales, Court Judges, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Curtis, Connie June; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1979
The score distributions of the two methods of administration described in the title revealed comparable means, standard deviations, and general shape of distribution. With respect to validity coefficients, no appreciable differences were found. (JKS)
Descriptors: Comparative Testing, Educational Testing, Eye Hand Coordination, Grade 2