NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 1 to 15 of 719 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Sin Wang Chong; Tingjun Lin – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
Feedback provided by peer reviewers plays a pivotal role in any journal peer-review model. Peer-review feedback helps authors reconsider their manuscripts in a new light and improve their work before it is published. While there is a wealth of knowledge and empirical evidence focusing on effective feedback practices in educational settings, there…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Feedback (Response), Journal Articles, Authors
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Kay Hammond; Julie Trafford – Higher Education Research and Development, 2024
The peer review of journal article manuscripts is a complex and emotionally fraught process. This article draws on how 25 academic authors used metaphor to describe their experiences of manuscript peer review. A critical analysis of these metaphors provided insight into the structures, relationships of power, and their emotional impacts. Over…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Writing for Publication, Peer Evaluation, Journal Articles
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Johnston, Alexandra L.; Baik, Chi; Chester, Andrea – Higher Education Research and Development, 2022
Over recent decades, peer review of teaching has become an important mechanism for improving the quality of teaching in higher education. While there is considerable international research on peer review of teaching outcomes, these are not widely reported within Australian universities. This paper reports on a systematic review of published…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Peer Evaluation, College Faculty, Collegiality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Fileborn, Bianca; Wood, Mark; Loughnan, Claire – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2022
Research on peer review to date has focused on its role as a formal compliance mechanism, a process for enhancing and developing teaching practice, and as a considerable source of anxiety for educators. In this paper, we draw on scholarly reflections from our experience of undertaking a reciprocal, formative peer review in an Australian higher…
Descriptors: Teacher Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Formative Evaluation, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Grainger, Peter – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2021
Peer review is viewed as a valid quality assurance mechanism in higher education. Peer review of teaching is common practice at universities in Australia. However, peer review of assessment is a relatively new innovation in tertiary education. Peer review of assessment in a Triad structure utilised data, via interviews with academics and students,…
Descriptors: Assessment Literacy, Scoring Rubrics, Peer Evaluation, Quality Assurance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Sharp, Laurie A.; Rodriguez, Regina Chanel – Journal of Educators Online, 2020
Peer review learning activities have been deemed an effective way to improve writing quality among graduate students. However, there was a paucity of extant literature that examined technology-based peer review learning activities. To address this gap, the present study investigated how technology tool usage affected the instructional design of…
Descriptors: Educational Technology, Technology Uses in Education, Peer Evaluation, Graduate Students
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Haubrick, John; Levy, Deena; Cruz, Laura – Online Learning, 2021
In this study we looked at how participation in a peer-review process for online Statistics courses utilizing a master course model at a major research university affects instructor innovation and instructor presence. We used online, anonymous surveys to collect data from instructors who participated in the peer-review process, and we used…
Descriptors: Online Courses, Peer Evaluation, Statistics Education, College Faculty
Modern Language Association, 2022
The guidelines offer suggestions for departments, institutions, and faculty members in languages and literatures for valuing and assessing research in the public humanities. Because much public humanities scholarship involves engagement with communities, particularly bilingual and multilingual communities, this document places particular emphasis…
Descriptors: Guidelines, Humanities, Second Language Learning, Second Language Instruction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Gardner, Anne; Willey, Keith – European Journal of Engineering Education, 2019
Peer review has been the focus of an ongoing study at a series of recent annual conferences of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE). A further development of this study has been to explore the perspective/s of the authors of these conference papers and the impact that peer review can have on their development as…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Researchers, Engineering Education, Professional Identity
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Enslin, Penny; Hedge, Nicki – Journal of Philosophy of Education, 2018
As universities in the United Kingdom gear themselves up for the next Research Excellence Framework, REF2021, with peer review at its core, we critically re-visit the idea of peer review as a gold standard proxy for research excellence. We question the premise that anonymous peer review is a necessary and enabling condition for impartial, expert…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Universities, Foreign Countries, Research
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Esterhazy, Rachelle; de Lange, Thomas; Bastiansen, Sofie; Wittek, Anne Line – Review of Educational Research, 2021
Over the past decades, peer review of teaching has become commonplace at many universities around the world. Though research on the topic is expanding, much of the literature is composed of qualitative studies that offer relevant empirical findings but often have limited foundations in theory. Using a framework synthesis approach, we synthesize…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, College Faculty, Faculty Development, Collegiality
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Rocío Barrios-Rodríguez; Inmaculada Salcedo-Bellido; José Juan Jiménez-Moleón; Macarena Lozano-Lorca; Noelia Galiano-Castillo; Enrique José Cobos; José Dámaso Vílchez Rienda; Rocío Olmedo-Requena; Carmen Amezcua-Prieto; Sandra Martín-Peláez; Carmen María González Domenech; Juan Pedro Arrebola Moreno; Raúl A. Rica; María Eugenia García-Rubiño; Pilar Requena – International Journal for Academic Development, 2023
In a peer-review of teaching (PRT) program, we aimed to i) use pre- and post-observation questionnaires to enhance self-reflection, and ii) perform a nominal group technique (NGT) to agree on improvements. The questionnaires showed that PRT helped discovering new weaknesses but not new strengths, and that preconceived negative feelings vanished…
Descriptors: Peer Evaluation, Teacher Evaluation, College Faculty, Reflection
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
Moritz, Dominique; Pearce, Simone; Christensen, Larissa S.; Stamboulakis, Drossos – Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 2021
One of the challenges of 21st-century academia is meeting the often-competing demands from students, universities, and professional associations. Among many diversities, students at regional universities, such as the University of the Sunshine Coast (USC), often have higher rates of first-in-family learners than metropolitan counterparts. Law…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, College Faculty, College Students, Student Needs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Romero-Ivanova, Christina Louise; Cook, Paul; Faurote, Greta – English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 2021
Purpose: This study centers on high school pre-teacher education students' reviews of their peers' digital stories. The purpose of this study is twofold: to bring digital storytelling to the forefront as a literacy practice within classrooms that seeks to privilege students' voices and experiences and also to encapsulate the authors' different…
Descriptors: Preservice Teacher Education, High School Teachers, Teacher Attitudes, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Badenhorst, Cecile; Pickett, Sarah; Arnold, Christine; Lewis, Leah; Vaandering, Dorothy; McLeod, Heather; Buley, Jan; Goodnough, Karen; Maich, Kimberly; Penney, Sharon; Young, Gabrielle – Higher Education Research and Development, 2021
Our group of early- and mid-career women faculty members in a mid-sized Canadian university examined the peer review process and our experiences of being reviewed. Using post-structural feminist literature, we theorised how subjectivities are shaped by the pressures of neoliberal incursions into university work. The impact of peer review can be…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Scholarship, Writing for Publication, College Faculty
Previous Page | Next Page »
Pages: 1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  |  7  |  8  |  9  |  10  |  11  |  ...  |  48