NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Showing 1 to 15 of 20 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Vogt, Carl W.; Robles, Martin J. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
Some current controversies in the growing body of equal employment law are examined: wage comparability in the context of sex discrimination; procedural sections of the laws and related litigation; class actions by the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission; the scope of litigation; and the criteria for conferring standing on the plaintiff.…
Descriptors: Court Litigation, Employment Practices, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lyons, Edward C. – Journal of College and University Law, 1993
Court litigation in which the claim (to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission) that a faculty collective bargaining agreement violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act is examined. Focus is on arbitration of wrongful termination cases. Conflicting judicial rationales applied in two cases are discussed, and a practical solution is…
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Collective Bargaining, College Administration, College Faculty
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Pieronek, Catherine – Journal of College and University Law, 1994
Title IX of the Educational Amendments of 1972, Civil Rights Act of 1971, designed to ensure equal educational opportunity for men and women, is reviewed as it pertains to college athletics. Related litigation and National Collegiate Athletic Association efforts to promote compliance are examined, an argument for excluding revenue-producing sports…
Descriptors: College Administration, College Athletics, Compliance (Legal), Equal Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Williams, Joseph P. – Journal of College and University Law, 1995
The two standard justifications for different salaries paid to male and female coaches under 1963 and 1964 civil rights/equal pay legislation must fail under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which independently prohibits gender discrimination in employment and mandates equal athletic opportunity for female students. Some suggestions…
Descriptors: Access to Education, Athletic Coaches, Civil Rights Legislation, College Athletics
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Graff, Doralice McEuen; And Others – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
The case of Blair vs. Washington State University revives the state equal rights amendment as a feasible and powerful cause of action against sex-based discrimination, in college athletics and beyond. Washington's amendment mandated equality in funding, facilities, treatment, and opportunities for Washington State University's women's…
Descriptors: Athletes, College Athletics, Court Litigation, Higher Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Casey, Anita – Journal of College and University Law, 1982
Increased litigation in areas of indirect discrimination in higher education is expected. Indirect discrimination may manifest itself in an institution's failure to promote or grant tenure, its transfer of personnel, changes in the nature of assignments, harassment of faculty members, or other actions that ultimately cause the employee to resign.…
Descriptors: College Faculty, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Faculty Promotion
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Barnes, Margaret V.; Schlottman, Brent A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1982
The 1978 amendments of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act tenure exemptions are discussed. The question of whether faculty members now serving in nontenured capacities can be dismissed on the basis of age is examined. A rebuttal to an article by Stuart H. Bompey is included. (MLW)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, College Faculty, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ruebhausen, Oscar M. – Journal of College and University Law, 1988
Introducing more flexibility into the fixed dates for termination of tenure is consistent with academic freedom and higher education's mission. However, such a policy should encourage both continuity and change, preserve job security and accountability, allow for institutional and faculty planning, comply with laws, and harmonize with a retirement…
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, College Faculty, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Legislation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Flygare, Thomas J. – Journal of College and University Law, 1981
Court litigation on sex discrimination in public agency hiring may significantly alter the balance between plaintiff and defendant in Title VII action, but its narrow view of the tone of the law may be affected more than procedure. (MSE)
Descriptors: Civil Rights Legislation, Court Litigation, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Federal Programs
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Lee, Barbara A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1982
The extension of Title VII to college faculty provided a mechanism for relief in cases where faculty were denied reappointment, promotion, or tenure for reasons unrelated to their job performance. The standards of review in Title VII cases and the court's role in academic Title VII cases are discussed. (MLW)
Descriptors: Academic Freedom, College Faculty, Confidentiality, Court Litigation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ward, Nicholas D. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
An approach is developed to evaluating an employment civil rights claim, on the theory that proper diagnosis will facilitate a more appropriate defensive strategy. The statutory basis for the claims, substance of the complaint, parties defendant, pretext, feasible alternatives, and reasonable accommodation are discussed as claim criteria. (MSE)
Descriptors: Civil Rights, Compliance (Legal), Court Litigation, Due Process
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Nelson, Bruce A.; Ward, Richard W. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
For each major federal antidiscrimination statute the various standards of proof adopted by the courts are reviewed. A uniform model approach is proposed as a means of eliminating confusion about the type and quantum of proof necessary in litigation. (MSE)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Court Litigation, Employment Practices, Equal Opportunities (Jobs)
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bompey, Stuart H. – Journal of College and University Law, 1979
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) and its 1978 amendments are discussed. This statute protects all aged 40 to 70, and it has had a widespread effect. Although the 1978 amendments clarify several issues, there are still many questions left, including retirement issues. (MLW)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Constitutional Law, Court Litigation, Employment Practices
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Rothstein, Mark A. – Journal of College and University Law, 1984
The wide range of reproductive hazards encountered by university employees in a variety of job classifications are outlined, and the legal issues raised by possible employment discrimination claims and potential tort liability for reproductive injuries are discussed. Employer responses to the problem and public policy concerns are also examined.…
Descriptors: Employment Practices, Equal Opportunities (Jobs), Higher Education, Industry
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bompey, Stuart H.; Witten, Richard E. – Journal of College and University Law, 1980
An overview is given of the mechanics of dispute resolution under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Described and analyzed are the various stages during the processing of a dispute when settlement is possible. The effects of Bakke and Weber decisions on the process are considered. (MSE)
Descriptors: Age Discrimination, Arbitration, Civil Rights, Court Litigation
Previous Page | Next Page ยป
Pages: 1  |  2