NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: ED615794
Record Type: Non-Journal
Publication Date: 2020
Pages: 15
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-
EISSN: N/A
Main Reasons to Call a Text into Question
Viennot, Laurence; Décamp, Nicolas
Contributions from Science Education Research
This chapter illustrates the main warning signals that could help us to detect the flaws of an explanation in physics: internal contradiction (two examples); direct contradiction of a law of physics (one example); indirect contradiction of a law of physics (one example); logical incompleteness of an explanation (three examples); overgeneralization (three examples); incompatibility with a thought experiment (three examples); incompatibility with an unperformed experiment (one example). Finally, we point out that several warning signals can intervene in parallel to question a given text, as shown in a last example (the direction of the current in the batteries). [For the complete volume, "Developing Critical Thinking in Physics: The Apprenticeship of Critique. Contributions from Science Education Research. Volume 7," see ED615688.]
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. One New York Plaza, Suite 4600 New York, NY 10004. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-460-1700; e-mail:customerservice@springernature.com; Web site: https://www.springer.com/gp/education-language
Publication Type: Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A