Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 16 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 117 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 249 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 566 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Researchers | 52 |
| Practitioners | 38 |
| Teachers | 16 |
| Parents | 2 |
| Students | 2 |
| Support Staff | 2 |
Location
| Australia | 21 |
| Canada | 18 |
| United Kingdom | 14 |
| China | 13 |
| Netherlands | 11 |
| France | 9 |
| Finland | 8 |
| Germany | 8 |
| New York | 7 |
| Greece | 6 |
| Hong Kong | 6 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
| Elementary and Secondary… | 6 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 2 |
| Civil Rights Act 1964 Title IV | 1 |
| Elementary and Secondary… | 1 |
| National Defense Education Act | 1 |
| No Child Left Behind Act 2001 | 1 |
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
Politzer, Robert L. – English Record, 1971
The auditory discrimination ability of pupils who are generally classified as "socioeconomically" or "culturally" disadvantaged is the subject of recent research. The concept of the disadvantaged child that has auditory discrimination difficulties--and associated with them problems in reading and perhaps even speaking--was quickly and widely…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Disadvantaged Youth, Listening Skills, Nonstandard Dialects
BERGAN, JOHN R. – 1966
EFFECTS OF TONAL MEMORY OF TWO KINDS OF FACTORS WERE STUDIED. THE FACTORS WERE (1) THE CHARACTERISTICS OF STIMULI PRESENTED TO THE SUBJECT IN A PITCH IDENTIFICATION TASK, AND (2) THOSE EFFECTING THE RESPONSE THAT THE SUBJECT MAKES IN SUCH A TASK. FIVE HYPOTHESES WERE ADVANCED FOR STUDY. THE UNDERLYING ASSUMPTION WAS THAT THERE ARE IMPORTANT…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Experimental Programs, Feedback
Peer reviewedBirch, Leann Lipps – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1978
The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether age differences noted when two tasks are performed concurrently can be accounted for in terms of age differences in single task baseline performance. Subjects were two groups of 12 eight-year-olds, and one group of 12 thirteen-year-olds. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Children, Performance Factors
Peer reviewedMolfese, Dennis L.; Hess, Thomas M. – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1978
Examines the auditory evoked potentials (AEP) in the left and right hemispheres of the brain in response to variations in voice onset time (VOT) differences within and between phoneme categories. Subjects were 12 preschool children. (BD)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Electroencephalography, Neurological Organization
Peer reviewedWalker, Robert – Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 1987
Reports the results of a study of pitch perception among urban and rural children (n=200) who had differing amounts of formal music training. Results showed all children could hear differences in the stimuli presented, but only the musically trained could correctly attribute the difference to a change in pitch. (RKM)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Cultural Differences, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education
Peer reviewedObrzut, John E.; And Others – Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1986
Delineates the effect of attentional bias on preadolescents' dichotic listening performance by using four different types of stimulus material (words, digits, CV syllables, and melodies) under free recall and directed attention conditions. (HOD)
Descriptors: Attention, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Listening
Problems of Validity in Connection with the Concept of Auditory Discrimination between Speech Sounds
Peer reviewedSkjelfjord, Vebjorn J. – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 1975
An attempt was made to show that the connection repeatedly found between reading scores and scores on tests for auditive discrimination between speech sounds in children with no articulatory defects, results from the fact that the tests really measure a special skill in phonemic segmentation, a skill which is promoted by the instruction in…
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewedNober, Linda W. – Reading Teacher, 1973
Supports auditory research which clarly demonstrates that auditory perception is adversely affected by noise. (Author/RB)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Classroom Environment, Classroom Research
Peer reviewedSergeant, Desmond – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1973
Purpose of this article is to report an investigation of the usefulness of hearing tests under various conditions, and of the validity of such tests for the study of musicality. (Author)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Music, Research Methodology
Peer reviewedHair, Harriet I. – Journal of Research in Music Education, 1973
Purpose of this study was to determine if children in the first grade could discriminate whether two paired chords were the same or different, could learn to associate a tone with a chord in four brief training sessions, and could improve more in harmonic discrimination when performing chords in the training sessions than when merely listening to…
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Grade 1, Music, Responses
Gengel, Roy W. – J Speech Hearing Res, 1969
Part of author's Ph.D. dissertation, Washington University, 1968. (JJ)
Descriptors: Audiometric Tests, Auditory Discrimination, Electronic Equipment, Exceptional Child Research
Treon, Martin A. – Lang Speech, 1970
Descriptors: Articulation (Speech), Auditory Discrimination, Consonants, Hypothesis Testing
Peer reviewedCrowder, Robert G. – Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1982
The auditory memory loss of same-different vowel discrimination experiments with a silent delay appear to be asymptotic at about three seconds, whether measured by correct discrimination or by contextual influences of the first vowel on identification of the second. (Author/PN)
Descriptors: Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Perception, Context Clues, Higher Education
Peer reviewedFuller, Peter W.; And Others – Child Development, 1981
Determines whether an averaged evoked potential technique using a random-v-repetitive presentation mode could be used to study infant auditory discrimination. Results showed a main effect of presentation mode with shorter latency for random v repetitive. The shortest onset latency was for random stimulus at the fast rate. (Author/DB)
Descriptors: Attention Span, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Stimuli, Auditory Tests
Peer reviewedDavis, Sylvia M.; McCroskey, Robert L. – Child Development, 1980
Focuses on auditory fusion (defined in terms of a listerner's ability to distinguish paired acoustic events from single acoustic events) in 3- to 12-year-old children. The subjects listened to 270 pairs of tones controlled for frequency, intensity, and duration. (CM)
Descriptors: Age Differences, Auditory Discrimination, Auditory Tests, Children


