NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Does not meet standards3
Showing 631 to 645 of 1,912 results Save | Export
Carvell, James – Thrust for Education Leadership, 1972
An attempt has been made by the Ocean View School District to develop tools and procedures of evaluation which have as an outcome the personel improvement of the evaluatee. (Author)
Descriptors: Administration, Administrative Organization, Administrator Evaluation, Case Studies
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Redfern, George B. – NASSP Bulletin, 1972
That a principal's productivity can be measured is one of the author's basic beliefs. He advocates a process of evaluation by objectives. (Editor)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Evaluation Criteria, Evaluation Methods
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ingraham, William W.; Keefe, John E. – School Management, 1972
A program for school administrators involves the establishing of performance goals on a mutual basis with objectives that are measurable and attainable. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Evaluation Methods, Management by Objectives, Management Development
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Bergquist, Harold – Catalyst for Change, 1972
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Administrator Evaluation, Educational Administration, Evaluation
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McKague, Terrence R. – Educational Administration Quarterly, 1970
Fiedler's theory of leader effectiveness is described and related to other approaches to leadership. The application of Fiedler's concepts to educational organizations is investigated through a discussion of studies carried out in western Canadian schools. (Author)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Attitudes, Interpersonal Competence, Leadership
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Fallon, Bernard V. – NASSP Bulletin, 1974
For those who aspire to become administrators, it is important that they have some advance functional knowledge of the assistant principalship. Myriad demands are made on this position, which is largely an under-appreciated one. This writer portrays both the advantages and disadvantages inherent in the job. (Editor)
Descriptors: Administrator Attitudes, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Administrator Responsibility
Schaefer, William – School Administrator, 1983
For several years, the merit pay program of Madison School District in Phoenix (Arizona) has rated administrators by a system that includes equitable work objectives, measurable job targets and priorities, and noncompetitive rating scales. The Madison merit plan suggests some steps for other districts wanting to set up similar plans. (JW)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Elementary Education, Merit Pay, Personnel Evaluation
Bainbridge, William L.; Evans, George C. – North Central Association Quarterly, 1982
Describes the REASONS (Responsive, Evaluative Accountability System Operating Newark Schools) program, based on team-oriented management by objectives principles. Reviews REASONS' system for annually defining and refining district missions and system development, unit development, personal growth, and operational objectives, which serve as the…
Descriptors: Accountability, Administrator Evaluation, Management by Objectives, Management Systems
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Hoyt, Donald P. – New Directions for Higher Education, 1982
Three criteria for a sound evaluation program are identified: procedures should be credible, valid, and fair. Assessing administrative performance must begin with explication of contextual factors and unique characteristics that constrain or enhance opportunities. (MLW)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Responsibility, College Administration, Evaluation Criteria
Kneeland, Steven J. – CTM: The Human Element, 1980
Having identified the problem of managerial transition in a previous article (CE 510 277), the author outlines a strategy for change which includes performance appraisal, definition of the management structure, and counselling for the individual in transition. (SK)
Descriptors: Administrative Organization, Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Job Performance
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Koll, Patricia J. – Planning and Changing, 1979
Surveyed professors of educational administration, interns in educational administration, and practicing administrators who had hosted interns, to determine the degree of consensus on criteria for evaluating administrative interns and to determine the perceived importance of affective criteria. (Author/IRT)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Qualifications, Administrators, Affective Behavior
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Thomas, A. Ross – International Review of Education, 1976
Reports on a large number of research studies into the "organizational climate" ("personality" or "ethos") of schools in several countries. (Editor)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Educational Administration, Educational Research, Measurement Instruments
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Ginsberg, Rick; Berry, Barnett – Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 1990
Issues associated with evaluation of principals are discussed, including the state of the art, literature reviews, instruments and methods, guidelines and textbooks, surveys of practices, research and evaluation studies, and standards. The need for a database from which sound decisions about various methods/techniques may be made is highlighted.…
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Educational Research, Elementary Secondary Education, Principals
Child Care Information Exchange, 1990
This Exchange Evaluation Instrument is designed for the staff of a day care center to use in evaluating the center director. (DR)
Descriptors: Administrator Effectiveness, Administrator Evaluation, Day Care Centers, Early Childhood Education
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Brown, Dennis E.; Rodriguez, Roy C. – Community/Junior College Quarterly of Research and Practice, 1989
Describes the process used to develop and validate a self-assessment instrument that could be used by community college administrators to evaluate 30 dimensions of their job performance. The instrument was tested by 62 administrators at 3 community colleges and found to be valid and reliable. (DMM)
Descriptors: Administrator Evaluation, Administrator Responsibility, Community Colleges, Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  39  |  40  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  ...  |  128