NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing 661 to 675 of 1,317 results Save | Export
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
van der Linden, Wim J.; Veldkamp, Bernard P. – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004
Item-exposure control in computerized adaptive testing is implemented by imposing item-ineligibility constraints on the assembly process of the shadow tests. The method resembles Sympson and Hetter's (1985) method of item-exposure control in that the decisions to impose the constraints are probabilistic. The method does not, however, require…
Descriptors: Probability, Law Schools, Admission (School), Adaptive Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Yan, Duanli; Lewis, Charles; Stocking, Martha – Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 2004
It is unrealistic to suppose that standard item response theory (IRT) models will be appropriate for all the new and currently considered computer-based tests. In addition to developing new models, we also need to give attention to the possibility of constructing and analyzing new tests without the aid of strong models. Computerized adaptive…
Descriptors: Nonparametric Statistics, Regression (Statistics), Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Bierman, Karen L.; Nix, Robert L.; Maples, Jerry J.; Murphy, Susan A. – Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2006
Although clinical judgment is often used in assessment and treatment planning, rarely has research examined its reliability, validity, or impact in practice settings. This study tailored the frequency of home visits in a prevention program for aggressive-disruptive children (n = 410; 56% minority) on the basis of 2 kinds of clinical judgment:…
Descriptors: Psychological Evaluation, Intervention, Home Visits, Prevention
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
Meyen, Ed; Poggio, John; Seok, Soonhwa; Smith, Sean – Focus on Exceptional Children, 2006
One of the most significant challenges facing policy makers in education today is to ensure that state assessments designed to measure student performance across specified grade-level curriculum content standards will allow all students to demonstrate what they have learned. This challenge is made complex by the varied attributes of students with…
Descriptors: Special Needs Students, Attitudes toward Disabilities, Adaptive Testing, Disabilities
Krass, Iosif A. – 1998
In the process of item calibration for a computerized adaptive test (CAT), many well-established calibrating packages show weakness in the estimation of item parameters. This paper introduces an on-line calibration algorithm based on the convexity of likelihood functions. This package consists of: (1) an algorithm that estimates examinee ability…
Descriptors: Ability, Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cliff, Norman – Psychometrika, 1977
Measures of consistency and completeness of order relationships derived from test data such as Guttman scales are proposed. The measures are generalized to apply to incomplete data such as data from tailored testing. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Programs, Item Analysis
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Cudeck, Robert A.; And Others – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
TAILOR, a FORTRAN computer program for tailored testing, is described. The procedure for a joint ordering of persons and items with no pretesting as the basis for the tailored test is given, and a brief discussion of the computer program is included. (Author/JKS)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Programs, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
McCormick, Douglas J.; Cliff, Norman – Educational and Psychological Measurement, 1977
An interactive computer program for tailored testing, called TAILOR, is presented. The program runs on the APL system. A cumulative file for each examinee is established and tests are then tailored to each examinee; extensive pretesting is not necessary. (JKS)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Computer Programs, Test Construction
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Hambleton, Ronald K., Ed.; van der Linden, Wim J., Ed. – Applied Psychological Measurement, 1982
Item response theory (IRT) is having a major impact on the field of testing. This special issue presents an introduction and seven papers concerning developments in IRT applications. Some important IRT research being conducted outside the United States is highlighted. (SLD)
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Equated Scores, Item Analysis, Latent Trait Theory
Kingsbury, G. Gage; Hauser, Carl – Northwest Evaluation Association, 2004
Among the changes in education called for under the No Child Left Behind act is the need for states to test students in a number of grades and subject areas. Scores from these tests are to be used for a variety of purposes, from identifying whether individual students are proficient, to helping determine whether schools are causing adequate growth…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Computer Assisted Testing, Adaptive Testing, Educational Assessment
Baker, Eva L. – 2003
This paper examines multiple measures of performance in school accountability systems from two perspectives: laterally (different indicators of different domains) and vertically (indicators that are at different levels of depth of the same domain). From these perspectives, organizational responsibility and instructional sensitivity are examined.…
Descriptors: Accountability, Adaptive Testing, Adjustment (to Environment), Evaluation Methods
Schnipke, Deborah L.; Reese, Lynda M. – 1999
Two-stage and multistage test designs provide a way of roughly adapting item difficulty to test taker ability. This study incorporated testlets (bundles of items) into two-stage and multistage designs, and compared the precision of the ability estimates derived from these designs with those derived from a standard computerized adaptive test (CAT)…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, College Entrance Examinations, Computer Assisted Testing, Law Schools
Bowles, Ryan; Pommerich, Mary – 2001
Many arguments have been made against allowing examinees to review and change their answers after completing a computer adaptive test (CAT). These arguments include: (1) increased bias; (2) decreased precision; and (3) susceptibility of test-taking strategies. Results of simulations suggest that the strength of these arguments is reduced or…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Algorithms, Computer Assisted Testing, Review (Reexamination)
Kim, Jong-Pil – 1999
This study was conducted to investigate the equivalence of scores from paper-and-pencil (P&P) tests and computerized tests (CTs) through meta-analysis of primary studies using both kinds of tests. For this synthesis, 51 primary studies were selected, resulting in 226 effect sizes. The first synthesis was a typical meta-analysis that treated…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Computer Assisted Testing, Effect Size, Meta Analysis
School Renaissance Inst., Inc., Madison, WI. – 2000
A study evaluated comparatively the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) Interactive Test and Advantage Learning Systems' STAR Reading Computer-Adaptive Standardized Test. Due to the different methods used for collecting and calculating norm-referenced scores in the two tests, scale score measures of reading performance were used for the comparative…
Descriptors: Adaptive Testing, Comparative Analysis, Comparative Testing, Elementary Secondary Education
Pages: 1  |  ...  |  41  |  42  |  43  |  44  |  45  |  46  |  47  |  48  |  49  |  ...  |  88