Publication Date
| In 2024 | 17 |
| Since 2023 | 50 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 104 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 346 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1481 |
Descriptor
| Achievement Rating | 2517 |
| Academic Achievement | 888 |
| Educational Assessment | 736 |
| Educational Indicators | 712 |
| Comparative Analysis | 673 |
| Scores | 530 |
| Achievement Gap | 446 |
| Higher Education | 442 |
| Gender Differences | 414 |
| Elementary School Students | 387 |
| Foreign Countries | 381 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
Author
| Froman, Terry | 8 |
| Tindal, Gerald | 5 |
| Alonzo, Julie | 4 |
| Ho, Andrew D. | 4 |
| McNeil, Michele | 4 |
| Reardon, Sean F. | 4 |
| Seever, Margaret | 4 |
| Wolf, Patrick J. | 4 |
| Zellman, Gail L. | 4 |
| Ahmann, J. Stanley | 3 |
| Airasian, Peter W. | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Publication Type
Education Level
Audience
| Policymakers | 182 |
| Community | 107 |
| Practitioners | 102 |
| Researchers | 35 |
| Teachers | 32 |
| Administrators | 19 |
| Parents | 12 |
| Students | 6 |
| Counselors | 1 |
| Media Staff | 1 |
Location
| United States | 76 |
| California | 73 |
| Florida | 64 |
| Texas | 50 |
| Canada | 49 |
| Ohio | 42 |
| Australia | 37 |
| Michigan | 36 |
| United Kingdom | 36 |
| North Carolina | 34 |
| Illinois | 32 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
| Meets WWC Standards without Reservations | 1 |
| Meets WWC Standards with or without Reservations | 1 |
| Does not meet standards | 4 |
Hamann, Julian; Ringel, Leopold – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2023
If there is one thing all university rankings have in common, it is that they are the target of widespread criticism. This article takes the many challenges university rankings are facing as its point of departure and asks how they navigate their hostile environment. The analysis proceeds in three steps. First, we unveil two modes of ranking…
Descriptors: Universities, Achievement Rating, Criticism, Responses
Chun, Hyunsik; Sauder, Michael – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2023
As rankings have become increasingly institutionalized in higher education, so too have the strategic responses adopted by universities to address them. A key component of these responses is the development of new expertise, embodied in personnel and organizational units, dedicated to managing quantitative assessments. We draw on a qualitative…
Descriptors: Universities, Achievement Rating, Foreign Countries, Expertise
Seyedeh Golafrooz Ramezani; Jani Ursin – Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 2024
In response to global competition in higher education, university rankings have been developed. These have been interpreted as indicating the regions and countries with the most prestigious and competitive higher education institutions. The rankings are viewed as important in many countries, but their role is ambiguous and contested in the Nordic…
Descriptors: Achievement Rating, Universities, Foreign Countries, Higher Education
Tom Bramley; Carmen Vidal Rodeiro; Frances Wilson – Cambridge University Press & Assessment, 2024
Traditionally in England, exam results in General Certificates of Secondary Education (GCSEs) (and before them O levels) and A levels have been reported as letter grades, with A (or A*) as the top grade, then B, C etc. The reforms gave the opportunity to revisit the arguments for different formats of reporting, and Cambridge Assessment contributed…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Secondary Schools, Rating Scales, Scoring Formulas
Chirikov, Igor – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2023
Global university rankings influence students' choices and higher education policies throughout the world. When rankers not only evaluate universities but also provide them with consulting, analytics, or advertising services, rankers are vulnerable to conflicts of interest that may potentially distort their rankings. The paper assesses the impact…
Descriptors: Conflict of Interest, Universities, Achievement Rating, Institutional Evaluation
Framework for Rating Higher Education Construction Programs in the US: Perspective of Administrators
Ghosh, Somik; Bigelow, Ben; Johnston, Jonathan – Journal of Civil Engineering Education, 2023
Ranking systems are readily available and offer a simplistic way to differentiate among universities. However, end-users are not informed about the criteria and methods used to develop the ranking systems. Whereas ranking systems are used by prospective students, their lack of reliability and transparency outweigh their benefits. There are a few…
Descriptors: Models, Construction (Process), Civil Engineering, Administrator Attitudes
Syed Haider Khalil; Syed Mohsin Ali Shah; Fahad Sultan; Muhammad Ibrahim Khan; Sher Nawaz – SAGE Open, 2023
The current study aims to examine how and why actors contest the business education field through rankings. Inspired by the field structuration process and field level change, we argue that categorization systems, in this case, rankings, construct boundaries of the business education field and redefine authority and elites for the field. Ten…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Business Schools, Program Evaluation, School Effectiveness
Markéta Matulová – Journal on Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 2023
The paper introduces a novel approach to university rankings that considers a university's contribution to sustainable development. It addresses the usual controversies surrounding the construction of rankings using composite indicators. The conventional approach typically involves normalizing sub-indicators and applying subjective weights for…
Descriptors: Universities, Foreign Countries, Data, Institutional Characteristics
Bonaccorsi, Andrea; Belingheri, Paola; Blasi, Brigida; Romagnosi, Sandra – Research Evaluation, 2022
Higher education institutions increasingly live in environments in which they are subject to evaluation and rankings. We examine the way in which Italian (mostly public) universities adapted to the new landscape created by the official research assessments, which have produced rankings at national level, published in 2013 and 2016. We compare the…
Descriptors: Universities, Institutional Characteristics, Achievement Rating, News Reporting
Morel, Robert C. – Higher Education Quarterly, 2023
This paper analyses international student prospectuses from twenty-two Japanese universities involved in the Top Global University Program (TGUP) to examine how universities in Japan present and understand internationalization. International prospectuses were analysed using qualitative text analysis to generate a series of themes connected to…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Universities, Global Approach, College Students
Barron, Gary R. S. – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2023
The sociologies of quantification, university rankings, and infrastructure are a loosely connected set of scholarly endeavors. Research in these areas typically examines production of certain types of quantification, their effects, and institutionalization. Despite these commonalities, scholars have noted a lack of conceptual coherence, debates on…
Descriptors: Universities, Achievement Rating, Global Approach, Ethnography
Lars Engwall Ed. – Higher Education Dynamics, 2024
This book examines the pros and cons of the internationalization of higher education institutions, which is an important feature of modern universities. It makes a significant contribution to our understanding of universities and an important input to the assessment of the internationalization of higher education institutions both for regulators…
Descriptors: Global Approach, Higher Education, Educational Benefits, Universities
Lauren Elizabeth Adlof – ProQuest LLC, 2023
This performance improvement-based dissertation in practice analyzed and addressed a retention performance problem embedded in a higher education setting. A problem of practice is defined as an ongoing performance problem that exists in the context of a scholar-practitioner's workplace (Burrington & Throne, 2021) which, if addressed, can lead…
Descriptors: Academic Achievement, Achievement Rating, School Holding Power, College Freshmen
Kuráth, Gabriella; Szabó-Bálint, Brigitta; Jarjabka, Ákos – Perspectives: Policy and Practice in Higher Education, 2022
The study is aimed at contributing to the research of developing the employer brand of a university with the help of a special university project. Our basic research question is whether a Jubilee project could be used to develop the employer brand of a university and strengthen employee engagement. The authors present the possibilities of…
Descriptors: Universities, Reputation, Achievement Rating, Employees
Jade Eloise Norris; Rachel Prosser; Anna Remington; Laura Crane; Katie Maras – Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 2024
Employment interviews can be challenging for autistic people. In addition to standard interview procedures often being inaccessible, features associated with autism (including atypical emotional expression, eye-contact, and gestures) may lead to negative first impressions. Research using vignettes and 'thin slices' of communication indicate that…
Descriptors: Employment Interviews, Autism Spectrum Disorders, Performance, Improvement

Peer reviewed
Direct link
