NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ949058
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2011-Dec
Pages: 6
Abstractor: As Provided
ISSN: ISSN-0094-730X
Public Attitudes toward Stuttering in Turkey: Probability versus Convenience Sampling
Ozdemir, R. Sertan; St. Louis, Kenneth O.; Topbas, Seyhun
Journal of Fluency Disorders, v36 n4 p262-267 Dec 2011
Purpose: A Turkish translation of the "Public Opinion Survey of Human Attributes-Stuttering" ("POSHA-S") was used to compare probability versus convenience sampling to measure public attitudes toward stuttering. Method: A convenience sample of adults in Eskisehir, Turkey was compared with two replicates of a school-based, probability cluster sampling scheme. Results: The two replicates of the probability sampling scheme yielded similar demographic samples, both of which were different from the convenience sample. Components of subscores on the "POSHA-S" were significantly different in more than half of the comparisons between convenience and probability samples, indicating important differences in public attitudes. Conclusions. If "POSHA-S" users intend to generalize to specific geographic areas, results of this study indicate that probability sampling is a better research strategy than convenience sampling. Educational objectives: The reader will be able to: (1) discuss the difference between convenience sampling and probability sampling; (2) describe a school-based probability sampling scheme; and (3) describe differences in "POSHA-S" results from convenience sampling versus probability sampling. (Contains 1 figure and 2 tables.)
Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Turkey
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A