Publication Date
| In 2025 | 0 |
| Since 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| College Entrance Examinations | 2 |
| Culture Fair Tests | 2 |
| Standardized Tests | 2 |
| Test Bias | 2 |
| Test Items | 2 |
| College Bound Students | 1 |
| Educational Research | 1 |
| Ethnic Groups | 1 |
| Public Schools | 1 |
| Scores | 1 |
| Social Class | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| College Board | 2 |
Author
| Camara, Wayne | 1 |
| Sathy, Viji | 1 |
Publication Type
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Evaluative | 2 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 2 |
| Postsecondary Education | 2 |
| High Schools | 1 |
| Secondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
| California | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| SAT (College Admission Test) | 2 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Download full textCollege Board, 2010
This is the College Board's response to a research article by Drs. Maria Veronica Santelices and Mark Wilson in the Harvard Educational Review, entitled "Unfair Treatment? The Case of Freedle, the SAT, and the Standardization Approach to Differential Item Functioning" (see EJ930622).
Descriptors: Test Bias, College Entrance Examinations, Standardized Tests, Test Items
Camara, Wayne; Sathy, Viji – College Board, 2004
This is the College Board's response to Roy O. Freedle's article in the Harvard Educational Review, entitled "Correcting the SAT's Ethnic and Social Class Bias: A Method for Reestimating SAT Scores." It is the authors' view that Freedle has presented no argument that would justify removing or de-emphasizing a critical college success…
Descriptors: College Entrance Examinations, Standardized Tests, Test Bias, Test Items
