Publication Date
| In 2025 | 39 |
| Since 2024 | 88 |
| Since 2021 (last 5 years) | 111 |
| Since 2016 (last 10 years) | 123 |
| Since 2006 (last 20 years) | 210 |
Descriptor
Source
Author
Publication Type
Education Level
| Higher Education | 129 |
| Postsecondary Education | 92 |
| Secondary Education | 8 |
| Elementary Secondary Education | 6 |
| Adult Education | 5 |
| High Schools | 4 |
| Two Year Colleges | 3 |
| Elementary Education | 1 |
| Grade 12 | 1 |
| Preschool Education | 1 |
Audience
| Practitioners | 19 |
| Policymakers | 17 |
| Teachers | 14 |
| Media Staff | 8 |
| Administrators | 5 |
| Researchers | 5 |
| Students | 2 |
| Support Staff | 1 |
Location
| United States | 15 |
| Canada | 13 |
| Australia | 12 |
| United Kingdom | 10 |
| India | 6 |
| California | 5 |
| China | 4 |
| France | 4 |
| Russia | 4 |
| Florida | 3 |
| Germany | 3 |
| More ▼ | |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
| Watson Glaser Critical… | 1 |
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Holly Ryan; Daniel Abramov; Samantha Acker; Sydney Elkins – Thresholds in Education, 2025
This paper explores the complexities of co-authorship involving generative AI in academic contexts, focusing on an honors English class where students engaged with AI tools like ChatGPT. It critiques the boundaries of authorship as defined by COPE, which argues AI cannot be an author due to its lack of accountability. The study explores the…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Writing (Composition), Honors Curriculum, English Instruction
Kong Chen; April C. Tallant; Ian Selig – Information and Learning Sciences, 2025
Purpose: Current knowledge and research on students' utilization and interaction with generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools in their academic work is limited. This study aims to investigate students' engagement with these tools. Design/methodology/approach: This research used survey-based research to investigate generative AI literacy…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Higher Education, College Students, Technology Integration
Amy Stornaiuolo; Jennifer Higgs; Opal Jawale; Rhianne Mae Martin – English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 2024
Purpose: With the rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI), it is important to consider how young people are making sense of these tools in their everyday lives. Drawing on critical postdigital approaches to learning and literacy, this study aims to center the experiences and perspectives of young people who encounter and…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Digital Literacy, Writing (Composition), Positive Attitudes
Muhammad Mujtaba Asad; Aqsa Ajaz – International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 2024
Purpose: A gripping keyword emerged in the dynamic world of 2022: GPT or the advent of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GAI), at its forefront, embodied by the mysterious ChatGPT. This technological marvel had been silently lurking in the background for just over five years. However, all of a sudden, it emerged onto the scene, capturing the…
Descriptors: Influence of Technology, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Synchronous Communication
Jiahui Luo – Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 2024
This study offers a critical examination of university policies developed to address recent challenges presented by generative AI (GenAI) to higher education assessment. Drawing on Bacchi's 'What's the problem represented to be' (WPR) framework, we analysed the GenAI policies of 20 world-leading universities to explore what are considered problems…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Educational Policy, College Students, Student Evaluation
Christopher Hill; Jace Hargis – New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2025
This article explores the intersection between academic integrity and generative AI (GenAI). It presents a tested framework for a versatile 3-h module applicable to various disciplines. Since ChatGPT's emergence, GenAI's impact on academic integrity has raised concerns, challenged established norms, and blurred lines of authorship. Engaging…
Descriptors: Ethics, Integrity, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software
Maja Stanko-Kaczmarek; Lilianna Dera; Halszka Koscielska – Journal of Creative Behavior, 2025
In the rapidly evolving field of artificial intelligence (AI) literature generation, understanding how society perceives AI-generated content, compared with human-produced literature is of paramount importance. This study investigated societal perceptions and biases toward AI-generated versus human-produced poetry. A sample of 123 participants was…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Creativity, Poetry, Bias
Henriikka Vartiainen; Teemu Valtonen; Juho Kahila; Matti Tedre – Information and Learning Sciences, 2025
Purpose: In 2022 generative AI took the Internet world by storm. Free access to tools that can generate text and images that pass for human creations triggered fiery debates about the potential uses and misuses of generative AI in education. There has risen a need to check the popular utopian and dystopian narratives about AI against the diversity…
Descriptors: Foreign Countries, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Software, Technology Uses in Education
Christine Ladwig; Dana Schwieger; Reshmi Mitra – Information Systems Education Journal, 2025
The rapid rise of AI use is creating some very serious legal and ethical issues such as bias, discrimination, inequity, privacy violations, and--as creators everywhere fear--theft of protected intellectual property. Because AI platforms "learn" by scraping training materials available online or what is provided to them through their…
Descriptors: Copyrights, Plagiarism, Intellectual Property, Computer Software
Ali Abbas Falah Alzubi; Mohd Nazim; Naji Alyami – Education and Information Technologies, 2025
AI-generative tools, such as ChatGPT, are argued to hold the potential to contribute to creative thinking in education broadly and second language education specifically. Nonetheless, existing literature underscores a critical requirement to elucidate the specific nature of this contribution among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) undergraduates…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Technology Uses in Education, Educational Benefits, Barriers
Ye Sul Park – Art Education, 2024
The advent of large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT and text-to-image generation systems like DALL-E developed by OpenAI has raised critical questions in education and art communities, urging us not only to reconceptualize our understanding of creativity, authorship, and human--machine relations, but also to examine their social and ethical…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Cultural Education, Art Education, Racial Discrimination
FX. Risang Baskara; Anindita Dewangga Puri; Concilianus Laos Mbato – Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 2024
The rapid advancement of Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies has made new opportunities available in language education. This qualitative study investigates using generative AI tools by university English as a Foreign Language (EFL) students to create podcasts for language learning. The research was based on 80 undergraduate students who…
Descriptors: Audio Equipment, Teaching Methods, English (Second Language), Undergraduate Students
Mohamed Ali Elkot; Eltaieb Youssif; Omer Elsheikh Hago Elmahdi; Mohammed AbdAlgane; Rabea Ali – Contemporary Educational Technology, 2025
Utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) technology in educational institutions for students with mild intellectual disabilities offers promising avenues for enhancing this population's learning outcomes and skill development. This study aims to investigate the effect of using generative conversational AI to improve English communication skills…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Mild Intellectual Disability, Students with Disabilities, Technology Uses in Education
Gary D. Fisk – Teaching of Psychology, 2025
Introduction: Recent innovations in generative artificial intelligence (AI) technologies have led to an educational environment in which human authorship cannot be assumed, thereby posing a significant challenge to upholding academic integrity. Statement of the problem: Both humans and AI detection technologies have difficulty distinguishing…
Descriptors: Technology Uses in Education, Writing (Composition), Plagiarism, Identification
Julia Jochim; Vera Kristina Lenz-Kesekamp – Information and Learning Sciences, 2025
Purpose: Large language models such as ChatGPT are a challenge to academic principles, calling into question well-established practices, teaching and exam formats. This study aims to explore the adaptation process regarding text-generative artificial intelligence (AI) of students and teachers in higher education and to identify needs for change.…
Descriptors: Artificial Intelligence, Student Needs, Higher Education, Technology Uses in Education

Peer reviewed
Direct link
