NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ856451
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2009
Pages: 22
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 40
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1530-5058
Integrative Analytic Approach to Detecting and Interpreting L2 Vocabulary DIF
Jang, Eunice Eunhee; Roussos, Louis
International Journal of Testing, v9 n3 p238-259 2009
In this article we present results of a Differential Item Functioning (DIF) study using Shealy and Stout's (1993) multidimensionality-based DIF analysis framework. In this framework, differences in test score distributions across different groups of examinees may be a result of multidimensionality if secondary dimensions (not the primary dimension measured by the test) differentially affect examinee performance. Thus, this framework requires both statistical and substantive judgments for identifying potential DIF items and substantiating the causes of DIF, which, as a result, will enhance a comprehensive construct validity argument. In this article, we illustrate step-by-step procedures of multidimensionality-based DIF analyses using LanguEdge reading comprehension test data. Qualitative data from think-aloud verbal protocols were used to generate DIF hypotheses about differential functioning of vocabulary items between two groups of Indo-European and non-Indo-European L2 learners. Statistical Simultaneous Item Bias Test (SIBTEST; Shealy & Stout, 1993) was used to test the DIF hypotheses. The DIF results supported the hypotheses by flagging four uniform DIF items and one crossing DIF item. Post-hoc analyses of the DIF-flagged items were performed by visual inspection of group differences using TestGraf (Ramsay, 2001) and revisiting the qualitative verbal data and analyses of cognate types. The results showed that DIF items with large effect sizes were associated with the following: (a) translation-equivalent cognates; (b) word meaning determined independent of context, and (c) less frequent, more difficult distracter words than those in stems. In light of empirical evidence, the article discusses implications for test development and validation processes. (Contains 2 tables, 3 figures and 2 footnotes.)
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Assessments and Surveys: Test of English as a Foreign Language