Publication Date
| In 2024 | 0 |
| Since 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2020 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2015 (last 10 years) | 1 |
| Since 2005 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Accuracy | 1 |
| Bias | 1 |
| Business Administration… | 1 |
| College Students | 1 |
| Cooperative Learning | 1 |
| Formative Evaluation | 1 |
| Grading | 1 |
| Group Activities | 1 |
| Peer Evaluation | 1 |
| Reliability | 1 |
| Student Behavior | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Source
| Higher Education: The… | 1 |
Author
| Boud, David | 1 |
| Sridharan, Bhavani | 1 |
| Tai, Joanna | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 1 |
| Reports - Research | 1 |
Education Level
| Higher Education | 1 |
| Postsecondary Education | 1 |
Audience
Location
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Peer reviewed
Direct linkSridharan, Bhavani; Tai, Joanna; Boud, David – Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 2019
The accuracy and consistency of peer marking, particularly when students have the power to reward (or penalise) during formative and summative assessment regimes, is largely unknown. The objective of this study is to evaluate students' ability and behaviour in marking their peers' teamwork performance in a collaborative group assessment context…
Descriptors: Summative Evaluation, Peer Evaluation, Cooperative Learning, Group Activities
