NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Back to results
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1012641
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2013
Pages: 6
Abstractor: As Provided
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0009-8655
EISSN: N/A
The Goldilocks Dilemma: Homework Policy Creating a Culture Where Simply Good Is Just Not Good Enough
Watkins, Paul J.; Stevens, David W.
Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, v86 n2 p80-85 2013
Throughout the decades of educational reform cycles, the value of homework has proven either meaningful or meaningless depending on the reforming framework. Questions about homework as simply busy work or knowledge work, mere content distraction or content extension, ambivalence toward importance, or discipline of character all cloud any conclusions about homework, good or bad. Our research is a case study of one rural, high school that has created a No Excuses Homework expectation that is embedded in the school's culture. Focus groups of faculty and students, interviews with both the principal and assistant principal, combined with quantitative data reveal a cultural shift within the organization. Three themes emerge as contributors to a cultural transformation around homework expectations: initial and ongoing professional development exploring the creation of meaningful homework assignments and consistent quality expectations, continuous support for students and parents in meaningful homework standards, and informed stakeholders regarding quality standards and consequences when standards are not met. The results of this study reveal that high expectations for homework quality can have an impact on student academic performance and motivation for meeting quality standards. Much of the criticism directed toward homework policies is the disjointed, low expectations that marginalize its impact on learning and the value in assessing student progress. Integrating homework as a valued cultural experience may offer a possible answer to some of its common criticism.
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site: http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: High Schools; Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Laws, Policies, & Programs: No Child Left Behind Act 2001
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A