NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Publication Date
In 20200
Since 20190
Since 2016 (last 5 years)0
Since 2011 (last 10 years)0
Since 2001 (last 20 years)1
Descriptor
Academic Failure1
Accountability1
African American Students1
American Indians1
Asian American Students1
At Risk Students1
Comparative Analysis1
Cutting Scores1
Disabilities1
Educational Improvement1
Educational Indicators1
Educational Legislation1
Educational Policy1
Elementary Schools1
English (Second Language)1
Federal Legislation1
Federal Programs1
Hispanic American Students1
Institutional Characteristics1
Intervals1
Limited English Speaking1
Low Achievement1
Low Income Groups1
Mathematics Achievement1
Middle Schools1
More ▼
Source
Thomas B. Fordham Institute1
Author
Cronin, John1
Dahlin, Michael1
McCahon, Donna1
Xiang, Yun1
Publication Type
Reports - Evaluative1
Education Level
Elementary Education1
Elementary Secondary Education1
Grade 31
Grade 41
Grade 51
Grade 61
Grade 71
Grade 81
Middle Schools1
Audience
Location
Arizona1
California1
Colorado1
Delaware1
Florida1
Georgia1
Idaho1
Illinois1
Indiana1
Kansas1
Maine1
Massachusetts1
Michigan1
Minnesota1
Montana1
Nevada1
New Hampshire1
New Jersey1
New Mexico1
North Dakota1
Ohio1
Rhode Island1
South Carolina1
Texas1
Vermont1
More ▼
Laws, Policies, & Programs
No Child Left Behind Act 20011
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Showing one result Save | Export
Cronin, John; Dahlin, Michael; Xiang, Yun; McCahon, Donna – Thomas B. Fordham Institute, 2009
The intent of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 is to hold schools accountable for ensuring that all their students achieve mastery in reading and math, with a particular focus on groups that have traditionally been left behind. Under NCLB, states have leeway to: (1) Craft their own academic standards, select their own tests, and define…
Descriptors: Federal Legislation, Educational Improvement, Educational Indicators, Federal Programs