Publication Date
| In 2023 | 0 |
| Since 2022 | 0 |
| Since 2019 (last 5 years) | 0 |
| Since 2014 (last 10 years) | 0 |
| Since 2004 (last 20 years) | 1 |
Descriptor
| Activism | 1 |
| Authors | 1 |
| Business Cycles | 1 |
| Climate | 1 |
| Conservation (Environment) | 1 |
| Debate | 1 |
| Developed Nations | 1 |
| Economic Change | 1 |
| Economic Development | 1 |
| Economic Progress | 1 |
| Economics | 1 |
| More ▼ | |
Author
| Nordhaus, William D. | 2 |
| Ashenfelter, Orley | 1 |
| Fischer, Stanley | 1 |
| Goldstein, Evan R., Comp. | 1 |
| McGraw, Harold W., Jr. | 1 |
| Samuelson, Paul A. | 1 |
| Solow, Robert M. | 1 |
Publication Type
| Journal Articles | 3 |
| Opinion Papers | 2 |
| Reports - Descriptive | 1 |
Education Level
Audience
Location
| Japan | 1 |
Laws, Policies, & Programs
Assessments and Surveys
What Works Clearinghouse Rating
Direct linkGoldstein, Evan R., Comp. – Chronicle of Higher Education, 2008
According to Freeman Dyson, an emeritus professor of physics at the Institute for Advanced Study, the debate about global warming has become too narrow and opinions have become too entrenched. Relying on a computer model designed by the Yale University economist William D. Nordhaus, Dyson compared the effectiveness and economic feasibility of…
Descriptors: Developed Nations, Foreign Policy, Public Policy, Global Approach
Peer reviewedSamuelson, Paul A.; McGraw, Harold W., Jr.; Nordhaus, William D.; Ashenfelter, Orley; Solow, Robert M.; Fischer, Stanley – Journal of Economic Education, 1999
Provides comments by Nobel laureate Paul A. Samuelson, Harold W. McGraw Jr., William D. Nordhaus, Orley Ashenfelter, Robert M. Solow, and Stanley Fischer on Samuelson's introductory textbook "Economics," as presented at the 1998 American Economic Association meetings in Chicago (Illinois). (CMK)
Descriptors: Authors, Economic Development, Economics Education, Higher Education
Peer reviewedNordhaus, William D. – International Social Science Journal, 1983
The major new development in American economics is the abandonment of neo-Keynesian economics and the reliance on modern monetarism and the rational expectation approach. The result is a stagnant economy with high unemployment. The reasons for this change and its implications are discussed. Suggestions for change are made. (IS)
Descriptors: Business Cycles, Economic Change, Economic Progress, Economics
