NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ974640
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2012-Jun
Pages: 8
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 15
ISSN: ISSN-1479-7860
Recognising Differences in Weed and Crop Species Recognition Skills of Agriculture Students
Burrows, Geoffrey E.
Bioscience Education, v19 Article 9 Jun 2012
Students in an agricultural science degree were surveyed to assess their ability to recognise plants of agricultural importance. The survey consisted of high quality images of 25 species. Students were surveyed at the start of their studies in first year, and at various times during their second year of studies. At the start of their studies students had, on average, a low (35% and 27%, 2011 and 2012 respectively) ability to recognise agricultural species, with a very wide range of individual responses (6-66%, 0-72%, 2011 and 2012 respectively). Species that were conspicuous at the landscape level were well known, as were species that had spines or stinging hairs, while many important agricultural plants were poorly known. Students at the start of second year had only a small improvement (average 41% and 42%, range 4-76% and 2-84%; 2011 and 2012 respectively) from their first year of study. This was understandable as most first year subjects were introductory science, with plant recognition not specifically taught. About three months later, at the end of a subject where plant recognition was one of the main practical activities, the average mark had improved by about 50% (average 61%, range 24-92%). About four months later, after a semester where plant recognition was not specifically taught, but aspects of pasture management and weed control were, the average mark had further improved to 73% (range 40-96%). The survey showed that although over 80% of these students had a strong rural background (live on farms, etc.) they started their studies with a relatively low ability to recognise species of agricultural importance. Through identification and recognition practicals and general exposure to agricultural plants their recognition abilities rapidly improved during second year. The wide spread of individual student abilities indicates the need to develop different modes of plant recognition instruction. (Contains 1 figure and 1 table.)
Centre for Bioscience, The Higher Education Academy. Room 9.15 Worsley Building, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK. Tel: +44-113-343-3001; Fax: +44-113-343-5894; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: United Kingdom (Wales)