ERIC Number: EJ966007
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2011-Mar
Pages: 6
Abstractor: ERIC
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0270-1367
EISSN: N/A
Available Date: N/A
Expediting the Institutional Review Board Process for Exercise Protocols
Macfarlane, Pamela A.; Looney, Marilyn A.
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, v82 n1 p129-134 Mar 2011
All researchers who use human participants in their study must obtain permission from their appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB). Once the IRB application enters the review process, a decision is made regarding the type of review it should receive: Level I administrative (exempt), Level II subcommittee (expedited), or Level III full board review. Typically, the time between application submission and receipt of IRB approval is extended as the level increases from administrative to full board review. This occurs because each successive level requires approval from more IRB members. These time intervals vary across academic institutions and can cause researcher frustration. The purpose of this article is to provide suggestions on how researchers may help "expedite" the IRB review process if they have had difficulty getting exercise protocols reviewed efficiently at the most appropriate level. (Contains 1 table.)
Descriptors: Researchers, Research, Evaluators, Research Methodology, Risk, Exercise, Exercise Physiology
American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance. 1900 Association Drive, Reston, VA 20191. Tel: 800-213-7193; Fax: 703-476-9527; e-mail: info@aahperd.org; Web site: http://www.aahperd.org
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A
Author Affiliations: N/A

Peer reviewed
Direct link
