NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ948065
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2011-Dec
Pages: 8
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 14
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-1382-4996
Optimization of Answer Keys for Script Concordance Testing: Should We Exclude Deviant Panelists, Deviant Responses, or Neither?
Gagnon, Robert; Lubarsky, Stuart; Lambert, Carole; Charlin, Bernard
Advances in Health Sciences Education, v16 n5 p601-608 Dec 2011
The Script Concordance Test (SCT) uses a panel-based, aggregate scoring method that aims to capture the variability of responses of experienced practitioners to particular clinical situations. The use of this type of scoring method is a key determinant of the tool's discriminatory power, but deviant answers could potentially diminish the reliability of scores by introducing measurement error. (1) to investigate the effects on SCT psychometrics of excluding from the test's scoring key either deviant panelists or deviant answers; (2) to propose a method for excluding either deviant panelists or deviant answers. Using an SCT in radiation oncology, we examined three methods for reducing panel response variability. One method ("outliers") entailed removing from the panel members with very low total scores. Two other methods ("distance-from-mode" and "judgment-by-experts") excluded widely deviant responses to individual questions from the test's scoring key. We compared the effects of these methods on score reliability, correlations between original and adjusted scores, and between-group effect sizes (panel-residents; panel-students; and residents-students). With a large panel (n = 45), optimization methods have no effect on reliability of scores, correlation and effect size. With a smaller panel (n = 15) no significant effect of optimization methods were observed on reliability and correlation, but significant variation on effect size was observed across samples. Measurement error resulting from deviant panelist responses on SCTs is negligible, provided the panel size is sufficiently large (greater than 15). However, if removal of deviant answers is judged necessary, the distance-from-mode strategy is recommended. (Contains 3 tables and 1 figure.)
Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A