NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ916799
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2010-Oct
Pages: 26
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 29
ISSN: ISSN-0731-9258
A Comparative Study of Partial Credit Assessment and Computer-Based Testing for Mathematics
Darrah, Marjorie; Fuller, Edgar; Miller, David
Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, v29 n4 p373-398 Oct 2010
This paper discusses a possible solution to a problem frequently encountered by educators seeking to use computer-based or multiple choice-based exams for mathematics. These assessment methodologies force a discrete grading system on students and do not allow for the possibility of partial credit. The research presented in this paper investigates whether students in a large multi-section mathematics course benefit more from grading exams with partial credit versus computerized exams with no partial credit. An alternate method is discussed for providing students with a summative assessment for extra credit at the end of the semester that offers an opportunity to correct mistakes made on problems during the semester for which they previously received no points. The partial credit scores students would have earned and the score the students received on the summative assessment are compared to determine if there is a relationship. This paper also discusses the process of testing this method with a large group of students in an Introduction to Calculus course at a major university. Qualitative data on student attitudes toward computerized exams is also examined and discussed. (Contains 4 notes, 4 tables, and 7 figures.)
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. P.O. Box 1545, Chesapeake, VA 23327-1545. Tel: 757-366-5606; Fax: 703-997-8760; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A