NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ902918
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2010-Dec
Pages: 18
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 50
ISSN: ISSN-1098-2140
Fighting Crime by Fighting Misconceptions and Blind Spots in Policy Theories: An Evidence-Based Evaluation of Interventions and Assumed Causal Mechanisms
van Noije, Lonneke; Wittebrood, Karin
American Journal of Evaluation, v31 n4 p499-516 Dec 2010
How effective are policy interventions to fight crime and how valid is the policy theory that underlies them? This is the twofold research question addressed in this article, which presents an evidence-based evaluation of Dutch social safety policy. By bridging the gap between actual effects and assumed effects, this study seeks to make fuller use of the practical relevance of evidence-based evaluations. The results reveal promising interventions and mechanisms for policy practice. In addition, the chosen approach advances current practice using evidence-based outcomes to distinguish plausible from implausible policy assumptions. An urgent need is signaled for governments to provide substantive reasoning for their policy choices. Many of the assumptions that correspond with evidence from impact evaluations relate to general prevention, often found within the strategy of situational prevention. Contrary to any general preventive or short-term effects, the assumptions regarding long-term specific prevention through law enforcement cannot be taken as read. (Contains 3 figures.)
SAGE Publications. 2455 Teller Road, Thousand Oaks, CA 91320. Tel: 800-818-7243; Tel: 805-499-9774; Fax: 800-583-2665; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Netherlands