NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ885774
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2010-Jun
Pages: 6
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 44
ISSN: ISSN-1082-989X
Regarding "p[subscript rep]": Comment Prompted by Iverson, Wagenmakers, and Lee (2010); Lecoutre, Lecoutre, and Poitevineau (2010); and Maraun and Gabriel (2010)
Serlin, Ronald C.
Psychological Methods, v15 n2 p203-208 Jun 2010
The sense that replicability is an important aspect of empirical science led Killeen (2005a) to define "p[subscript rep]," the probability that a replication will result in an outcome in the same direction as that found in a current experiment. Since then, several authors have praised and criticized 'p[subscript rep]," culminating in the 3 articles in the current issue of "Psychological Methods." In this article, Killeen's "p[subscript rep]" is reviewed, and the contributions of the current articles are summarized and discussed. An examination of the role of a measure of theoretical support such as "p[subscript rep]" in the acquisition of knowledge leads me to concur with Senn (2002) that "p[subscript rep]" is of little epistemological value.
American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002-4242. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A