NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ881361
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2010-Apr
Pages: 15
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 19
ISSN: ISSN-1537-2456
How Do Female Students Participate in Online Debates?
Davidson-Shivers, Gayle V.; Ellis, Holly Howard; Amarasing, Poonwilas Kay
International Journal on E-Learning, v9 n2 p169-183 Apr 2010
This case study focused on whether women, enrolled in a graduate course, would engage in online debate, and if so, whether their postings would contain traditional elements of argumentation (i.e., argue, elaborate, critique). Content analyses for two debates were performed. For the most part, the overarching messages in both debates were substantive in nature. Our analyses of embedded statements indicated that these women argued, provided evidence, elaborated on others' ideas and, surprisingly, critiqued others' comments in Debate 1. With the exception of critiquing others, they continued to use such elements even when directions became more general. Perhaps this was because of their initial guidance in debating and that this form of discourse was used periodically throughout the summer term. However, in both debates, they also chatted, acknowledged, and supported others, which are not typical elements of argumentation. This may indicate that women, at least in this instance, formed a different style of debating by incorporating their own communication style into the traditional argumentation format. (Contains 2 figures and 3 tables.)
Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education. P.O. Box 1545, Chesapeake, VA 23327-1545. Tel: 757-366-5606; Fax: 703-997-8760; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A