NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ877959
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2010-Apr
Pages: 7
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 0
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0028-3932
Departure from Normality in Multivariate Normative Comparison: The Cramer Alternative for Hotelling's "T[squared]"
Grasman, Raoul P. P. P.; Huizenga, Hilde M.; Geurts, Hilde M.
Neuropsychologia, v48 n5 p1510-1516 Apr 2010
Crawford and Howell (1998) have pointed out that the common practice of z-score inference on cognitive disability is inappropriate if a patient's performance on a task is compared with relatively few typical control individuals. Appropriate univariate and multivariate statistical tests have been proposed for these studies, but these are only valid if the data are Gaussian (normal) distributed. Previous studies have investigated the consequences for Type I error rates of using the univariate test when data are not Gaussian. In this paper we examine the effects of violation of the Gaussian assumption on nominal Type I error rates for the multivariate test. We also consider a new test that has been devised recently, called Cramer's test, as a viable alternative for the multivariate normative comparison. In simulations we show that the new test not only provides a distribution free alternative for existing methods, but also has the advantage that it is substantially more powerful in most common research settings. We demonstrate the use of the new test with an application to two individuals diagnosed with autism. (Contains 1 table and 3 figures.)
Elsevier. 6277 Sea Harbor Drive, Orlando, FL 32887-4800. Tel: 877-839-7126; Tel: 407-345-4020; Fax: 407-363-1354; e-mail: usjcs@elsevier.com; Web site: http://www.elsevier.com
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A