ERIC Number: EJ872691
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2010-Feb
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 0
The Neural Bases of Distraction and Reappraisal
McRae, Kateri; Hughes, Brent; Chopra, Sita; Gabrieli, John D. E.; Gross, James J.; Ochsner, Kevin N.
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, v22 n2 p248-262 Feb 2010
Distraction and reappraisal are two commonly used forms of cognitive emotion regulation. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown that each one depends upon interactions between pFC, interpreted as implementing cognitive control, and limbic regions, interpreted as mediating emotional responses. However, no study has directly compared distraction with reappraisal, and it remains unclear whether they draw upon different neural mechanisms and have different emotional consequences. The present fMRI study compared distraction and reappraisal and found both similarities and differences between the two forms of emotion regulation. Both resulted in decreased negative affect, decreased activation in the amygdala, and increased activation in prefrontal and cingulate regions. Relative to distraction, reappraisal led to greater decreases in negative affect and to greater increases in a network of regions associated with processing affective meaning (medial prefrontal and anterior temporal cortices). Relative to reappraisal, distraction led to greater decreases in amygdala activation and to greater increases in activation in prefrontal and parietal regions. Taken together, these data suggest that distraction and reappraisal differentially engage neural systems involved in attentional deployment and cognitive reframing and have different emotional consequences.
Descriptors: Cognitive Processes, Emotional Response, Brain, Comparative Analysis, Interaction, Science Education
MIT Press. Circulation Department, Five Cambridge Center, Cambridge, MA 02142. Tel: 617-253-2889; Fax: 617-577-1545; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Web site: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/jocn
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A