ERIC Number: EJ868338
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2009-Apr
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 0
What We Mean by Scope and Methods: A Survey of Undergraduate Scope and Methods Courses
Turner, Charles C.; Thies, Cameron G.
PS: Political Science and Politics, v42 n2 p367-373 Apr 2009
Self-reflective political scientists have extensively reviewed the history of the discipline and argued over its future, but to date there has been little effort to systematically survey undergraduate scope and methods courses (for an exception see Thies and Hogan 2005). This lack of data leaves the discipline unable to assess how much we are teaching undergraduates about the scope of political science or, indeed, what we mean by the scope of the discipline. Similarly, though there have been many battles waged over the appropriateness of various methodologies, it is not clear how much of this discussion, or how many of these methods, make it into the undergraduate classroom. Survey results from a nation-wide sample of political science departments indicate that most departments require a scope and methods course of their majors and that, while there is a great deal of variety in topics covered, some common themes exist and some common assignments are used.
Descriptors: Political Science, Intellectual Disciplines, Assignments, National Surveys, College Instruction, Methods, Course Content, College Curriculum, Undergraduate Study
Cambridge University Press. 100 Brook Hill Drive, West Nyack, NY 10994-2133. Tel: 800-872-7423; Tel: 845-353-7500; Fax: 845-353-4141; e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org; Web site: http://journals.cambridge.org/action/displayJournal?jid=PSC
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Evaluative
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Authoring Institution: N/A