NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ865742
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2009-Jun
Pages: 32
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 48
ISSN: ISSN-0013-1881
The Reliability of Results from National Curriculum Testing in England
Newton, Paul E.
Educational Research, v51 n2 p181-212 Jun 2009
Background: National curriculum tests have been administered in England for well over a decade. Although reliability evidence has been published, critics have argued that there is not enough evidence (of the right kind) and that test results may be insufficiently reliable. Purpose: This article collates and discusses evidence on the reliability of results from national curriculum testing in England. In particular, it examines the claim that at least 30% of students may be awarded incorrect national curriculum levels. Sources of evidence: Empirical evidence is collated from a range of sources (mainly published) focusing primarily upon internal consistency, marking consistency and level-setting consistency. Main argument and conclusion: There still remains some doubt over the extent of misclassification associated with national curriculum testing. However, there is no doubt that a substantial percentage of students would receive different levels were the testing process to be replicated within any particular year for any particular test. However, although results from national curriculum testing are somewhat unreliable, they are not necessarily too unreliable. (Contains 10 tables and 16 notes.)
Routledge. Available from: Taylor & Francis, Ltd. 325 Chestnut Street Suite 800, Philadelphia, PA 19106. Tel: 800-354-1420; Fax: 215-625-2940; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Elementary Secondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: United Kingdom