NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ786765
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2007-Sep
Pages: 35
Abstractor: Author
Reference Count: 0
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0020-4277
Understanding and Applying the Dynamics of Test Practice and Study Practice
Pavlik, Philip I., Jr.
Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, v35 n5 p407-441 Sep 2007
Two different methods of practice are available in the learning of simple information, test practice or study practice. Of these two methods of learning, research has generally shown that test practice is superior to study practice. However, this research has not considered the testing advantage with respect to the fact that test learning is uncertain (i.e. if recall fails, nothing appears to be learned) or with respect to the fact that study learning depends greatly on the duration of the study event. The following work clarifies these issues by presenting an integrated computational model of the relative costs and benefits of testing compared to study presentation [based on the ACT-R theory of declarative memory; Anderson, J.R. & Schooler, L.J. (1991). "Psychological Science" 2: 396-408; Pavlik Jr., P.I. & Anderson, J.R. (2005). "Cognitive Science" 29: 559-586]. This model was applied to determine how test and study practice can be optimally employed to improve learning and provides a framework for understanding the effects of mnemonic strategies in simple memory tasks.
Springer. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail: service-ny@springer.com; Web site: http://www.springerlink.com
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A