NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
ERIC Number: EJ628076
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2000
Pages: N/A
Abstractor: N/A
Reference Count: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0023-8309
Comprehending Speaker Intent in Rebuttal Analogy Use: The Role of Irony Mapping, Absurdity Comparison and Argumentative Convention.
Colston, Herbert L.
Language and Speech, v43 n4 p337-54 Oct-Dec 2000
Investigated the role that irony mapping, absurdity comparison, and argumentative convention play in interpreters' derivations of speaker's intentions in using rebuttal analogies. Three rebuttal types were rated on argumentativeness and social attack in verbal conflict and nonverbal conflict scenarios. Results found that analogies with ironic bases were perceived more as social attack and as more argumentative than analogies with absurd bases. (Author/VWL)
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A