The Comparative Validities of Traditional Item-Selection and Item-Sampling Procedures in Evaluation of Student and Class Progress Toward Course Objectives in Freshman Psychology.

Rothrock, Julia E.; Michael, William B.

Notes FAQ Contact Us

Peer reviewed

ERIC Number: EJ156060

Record Type: CIJE

Publication Date: 1976

Pages: N/A

Abstractor: N/A

ISBN: N/A

ISSN: N/A

EISSN: N/A

The Comparative Validities of Traditional Item-Selection and Item-Sampling Procedures in Evaluation of Student and Class Progress Toward Course Objectives in Freshman Psychology

Rothrock, Julia E.; Michael, William B.

Educational and Psychological Measurement, 36, 4, 925-32, Win 76

Tests constructed through item-sampling (where several tests are constructed and randomly assigned to testees) were compared to a traditional constant-item procedure for evaluating student and class progress in a community college freshman psychology class. The item-sampling approach did not appear to be superior. (JKS)

Descriptors: Evaluation Methods, Item Sampling, Measurement Techniques, Test Validity

Publication Type: N/A

Education Level: N/A

Audience: N/A

Language: N/A

Sponsor: N/A

Authoring Institution: N/A

Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A

Privacy | Copyright | Contact Us | Selection Policy | API