In the earlier chapters of "Interpreting Kant in Education," a reading of Kant was developed that contrasts sharply with the widespread 'Kantian' picture in education theory. Having discussed aspects of Kant's view in relation to empiricist and naturalist (mind-independent) epistemologies, I turn in this sixth chapter to contrast them with Richard Rorty's social consensus (mind-dependent) view of knowledge. Attention is drawn to empiricist understandings of epistemological concepts to illustrate the enduring influence of the Cartesian legacy, which, I argue, has shaped interpretations of Kant in education. Alternative understandings of some familiar concepts (previously introduced) are expanded on, with mind, world and their relation again being a point of discussion. Drawing on the work of John McDowell, I focus particularly on the ideas of objectivity and 'worldly constraint' as a basis for arguments developed in Part Two and in order to bring into view a richer and more acceptable picture of Kant's idealist view of knowledge.