NotesFAQContact Us
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1209507
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2019-Feb
Pages: 28
Abstractor: As Provided
ISSN: ISSN-1874-8597
Reframing Conversations about Teacher Quality: School and District Administrators' Perceptions of the Validity, Reliability, and Justifiability of a New Teacher Evaluation System
Paufler, Noelle A.; Clark, Chris
Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, v31 n1 p33-60 Feb 2019
In changing accountability contexts, policymakers are engaging in international dialogue and collaborative efforts with new opportunities to reframe conversations about how to measure teacher quality and to (re) design and implement evaluation systems accordingly to ensure that they are fair, useable, feasible, and accurate. This study examined the lived experiences of school and district administrators in a large, fast-growth, suburban district in the USA regarding their districts' new teacher evaluation system to better understand their perceptions of the system's validity and reliability such that justifiable conclusions may be drawn about teachers' effectiveness. Given concerns regarding validity and reliability, administrators generally discouraged external, high-stakes uses of evaluation results but valued the evaluation process and the data it provides for supporting teacher growth. As part of a larger study including teachers, findings can inform policymakers seeking to reform teacher evaluation frameworks to emphasize professional growth over high-stakes consequences.
Springer. Available from: Springer Nature. 233 Spring Street, New York, NY 10013. Tel: 800-777-4643; Tel: 212-460-1500; Fax: 212-348-4505; e-mail:; Web site:
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A