Raters must score accurately and consistently for classroom observation scores to be valid. This requires (a) a standard defining when scoring is accurate and consistent enough and (b) measuring and remediating rater performance against that standard. Current practice has focused on this second problem to the exclusion of the first. My goal here is to start a discussion about identifying a clear, explicit standard that ensures observation scores reflect a consistent view of teaching quality, rather than raters' idiosyncratic perspectives. In doing so, I connect current certification test cut-scores, the current practice most analogous to a standard, to explicit rater standards, highlighting both the inadequacy of cut-scores and the low standards implicit to current practice.