Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to check the veracity of educators' apprehensions about peer assessments by comparing them with the actual peer assessment scores. It also explores the levels of satisfaction and current usage of peer assessment tools among educators. Design/methodology/approach: The first phase of this study aims at providing insights into the educators' apprehensions, their satisfaction and usage levels of peer assessments. The second phase involves analysis of peer assessment scores of 539 students in 117 teams. Findings from statistical analysis of peer assessment scores are compared against the apprehensions of educators. Findings: The results do not support the apprehensions among educators about peer assessments. Findings on the usage, satisfaction levels of educators and their future intentions of using peer assessments are also presented in this paper. Research limitations/implications: Studies with larger sample size, qualitative in-depth research on experiences, designs and conditions of successful peer assessments and studies based on users' experiences of peer assessments will help in getting richer insights in this area. Practical implications: Results of this study indicate a need for educators to shed their apprehensions and adopt online or offline peer assessments tools with trust and confidence. Originality/value: This study is important due to the existence of contrary views, inconsistent results and lack of adequate familiarity about the use, efficacy and practice of peer assessments. Though previous studies have tried to establish the reliability of peer assessments, this study finds that educators are still apprehensive about peer assessments. This is a unique study as no previous research has attempted a comparative study to check the veracity of the apprehensions of educators about peer assessments using the actual peer assessment scores.