An examination is made of the possible impact of Rodriquez on other educational reform litigation presently pending in the courts or contemplated by reform advocates. An analysis of the relevant sections of the Rodriquez decision is presented, and alternative concepts which may limit the decision's consequences are suggested. Some of these concepts are applied to identify the future of specific areas of litigation (tracking and testing rights of handicapped children, sex-related classifications and school fees) that were developing before Rodriquez. (EH)