ERIC Number: EJ1137957
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2017
Abstractor: As Provided
Does More Accurate Knowledge of Course Grade Impact Teaching Evaluation?
Cho, Donghun; Cho, Joonmo
Education Finance and Policy, v12 n2 p224-240 Spr 2017
Students' different standards may yield different kinds of bias, such as self-directed (higher than their past performance) bias and peer-directed (higher than their classmates) bias. Utilizing data obtained from a natural experiment where some students were able to see their grades prior to teacher evaluations, and to investigate possible sources of bias, we empirically analyzed the role of information (such as the actual grade students received in their current course and their previous grade point average), and the average grade of the course, on the student evaluation of teaching. Because bias is sensitive to the accuracy of grade information, the randomized data examined in this paper are a valuable source for estimating both self-directed and peer-directed bias. We identify the existence of the two kinds of biases and demonstrate that the influence of peer-directed bias tends to increase after the accurate information on the course grade is revealed.
Descriptors: Grade Point Average, Academic Standards, Bias, Student Evaluation of Teacher Performance, Grades (Scholastic)
MIT Press. 55 Hayward Street, Cambridge, MA 02142. Tel: 617-253-2889; Fax: 617-253-1709; e-mail: email@example.com; Web site: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/loi/edfp
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A
Grant or Contract Numbers: N/A