NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
PDF on ERIC Download full text
ERIC Number: EJ1111288
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2008-May
Pages: 34
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 24
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: EISSN-2330-8516
Equating of Mixed-Format Tests in Large-Scale Assessments. Research Report. ETS RR-08-26
Kim, Sooyeon; Walker, Michael E.; McHale, Frederick
ETS Research Report Series, May 2008
This study examined variations of the nonequivalent-groups equating design for mixed-format tests--tests containing both multiple-choice (MC) and constructed-response (CR) items--to determine which design was most effective in producing equivalent scores across the two tests to be equated. Four linking designs were examined: (a) an anchor with only MC items; (b) a mixed-format anchor containing both MC and CR items; (c) a mixed-format anchor incorporating CR item rescoring; and (d) a hybrid combining single-group and equivalent-groups designs, thereby avoiding the need for an anchor test. Designs using MC items alone or those using a mixed anchor without CR item rescoring resulted in much larger bias than the other two design approaches. The hybrid design yielded the smallest root mean squared error value.
Educational Testing Service. Rosedale Road, MS19-R Princeton, NJ 08541. Tel: 609-921-9000; Fax: 609-734-5410; e-mail: RDweb@ets.org; Web site: https://www.ets.org/research/policy_research_reports/ets
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: N/A
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: N/A
Authoring Institution: N/A