NotesFAQContact Us
Collection
Advanced
Search Tips
Peer reviewed Peer reviewed
Direct linkDirect link
ERIC Number: EJ1056536
Record Type: Journal
Publication Date: 2014-Mar
Pages: 22
Abstractor: As Provided
Reference Count: 74
ISBN: N/A
ISSN: ISSN-0278-7393
Lexical Interference Effects in Sentence Processing: Evidence from the Visual World Paradigm and Self-Organizing Models
Kukona, Anuenue; Cho, Pyeong Whan; Magnuson, James S.; Tabor, Whitney
Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, v40 n2 p326-347 Mar 2014
Psycholinguistic research spanning a number of decades has produced diverging results with regard to the nature of constraint integration in online sentence processing. For example, evidence that language users anticipatorily fixate likely upcoming referents in advance of evidence in the speech signal supports rapid context integration. By contrast, evidence that language users activate representations that conflict with contextual constraints, or only indirectly satisfy them, supports nonintegration or late integration. Here we report on a self-organizing neural network framework that addresses 1 aspect of constraint integration: the integration of incoming lexical information (i.e., an incoming word) with sentence context information (i.e., from preceding words in an unfolding utterance). In 2 simulations, we show that the framework predicts both classic results concerned with lexical ambiguity resolution (Swinney, 1979; Tanenhaus, Leiman, & Seidenberg, 1979), which suggest late context integration, and results demonstrating anticipatory eye movements (e.g., Altmann & Kamide, 1999), which support rapid context integration. We also report 2 experiments using the visual world paradigm that confirm a new prediction of the framework. Listeners heard sentences like "The boy will eat the white …" while viewing visual displays with objects like a "white cake" (i.e., a predictable direct object of "eat"), "white car" (i.e., an object not predicted by "eat," but consistent with "white"), and distractors. In line with our simulation predictions, we found that while listeners fixated "white cake" most, they also fixated "white car" more than unrelated distractors in this highly constraining sentence (and visual) context.
American Psychological Association. Journals Department, 750 First Street NE, Washington, DC 20002. Tel: 800-374-2721; Tel: 202-336-5510; Fax: 202-336-5502; e-mail: order@apa.org; Web site: http://www.apa.org
Publication Type: Journal Articles; Reports - Research
Education Level: Higher Education; Postsecondary Education
Audience: N/A
Language: English
Sponsor: Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (NIH); National Science Foundation
Authoring Institution: N/A
Identifiers - Location: Connecticut
Grant or Contract Numbers: HD40353|HD060414|1059662|0748684